Hey!
I've never been there, but I got a report from a local that it's forbidden to cross the intersection, coming from North to South. I checked the map and there was a restriction already (both from N to S and from S to N), but it was ill-defined - a turn restriction has to have "from" "to" and "via" roles, and these 2 missed some of the roles. So I deleted them and created new ones.

Thanks!
Yes, and I thought I added all roles, and only later I realized something went wrong, so I fixed it in another changeset: changeset/80250293
Well at least I hope it's fixed now.

Thanks!

OK, thanks!
I guess we can leave it as it is (I saw you already reverted back to residential).

Hi,
I changed it to pedestrian since cars are not allowed to drive through there. You're right that it's not only for pedestrians, but it's also not residential - highway=residential.

I think highway=pedestrian + a bicycle=yes tag, would be the best solution here.
What do you think?

Hey!
I saw you wrote that there is a width restriction for vehicles, but then it looks like you blocked that segment completely with the gate (motor_vehicle=no).
Can you please clarify if it's possible to drive there or not? And it's possible, can you add the max width that is allowed?
Thanks,
Eran.

Thanks Andy!
And no worries Rebecca :-)

Hi Rebecca,
I looked at that way ID, but as far as I can see the node order goes NW, exactly like the one-way direction.
Unless I'm missing something here.
Thanks,
Eran.

thanks for the suggestion, Andy. We will consider it.

Hi Andy,
Regarding the turn restriction - I had to refresh my memory to realize why I removed it. The restriction (only_straight_on) was defined from way/230192075 to way/183555228. I was mistaken to think that it is defined from 183555228 to 230191864, which would have created a non-justified dead-end due to construction works I was reported about in Queen Victoria Street.
Sorry for this mistake. I will put this TR back in place.
All the best,
Eran.

Hello Andy,
As you mentioned yourself, I have answered and addressed several issues raised in the past. I answered the other pending questions now.
Thanks,
Eran.

Hi Andy,
I answered you in a private message.
Thanks,
Eran.

Hi Andy,
I received an update about construction work in this part of the street and thought it would be a good idea to split in order to adapt it for the upcoming change. In any case, I can revert it if you think it's necessary.

Hi Dave,
I split the ways since I got info about construction work in some parts of these streets. The original way included parts with construction and parts that weren't blocked and therefore I did the split. I did make sure that there were no turn restrictions that can be damaged by this change, but I missed the other relations. Thank you for fixing it.

Sorry, I meant Survey. All these changes were validated on-ground.
Thanks for noticing.
All the best,
Eran.

Hi,
The change was based on Bing's imagery. In any case, I will recheck it on-site.
Thanks for flagging,
Eran.

Hello,
I will recheck this place.
Thanks,
Eran.

Hello,
This is a good point! I didn't take under consideration pedestrians and cyclists. I removed the private tag, thanks for flagging this.
Do you have any other suggestions to handle such a case?
Best regards,
Eran.

Hello Derick,
Since when driving through this intersection one actually drives in a circular route, I thought a roundabout would better represent the reality. After re-reading the mini roundabout page I understand better the importance of this tag.
I will revert it back.
Thank you for flagging this,
Eran.

Hello Andy,
Thanks for letting me know.
I made this change about a month ago, probably by mistake. I will revert to service highways.
Best regards,
Eran.