Zie ook discussie op het forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=870823

Hi,

In this changeset you added details which is fine.

But image=file:///Z:/Bilder%20AlpenParks/Betriebe/Residence%20Zell%20am%20See%20Schillerstra%C3%9Fe/Au%C3%9Fenansicht%20Winter/DSC05196.JPG

will only work on your PC, so either remove that link or upload the image to somewhere on the Internet and change image= to point to the URI for the image

Greetings,

Martin.

Hi \Mike,

In node/9670848644 there is:

image=file:///home/mikael/Downloads/IMG_20220416_150950429_HDR.jpg

That might work on you own PC but not for others?

Can you update the picture to a site like https://commons.wikimedia.org and update the link to use wikimedia_commons=*

Greetings,

Martin.

I see, that was me on month ago.

I took the effort of removing cycleway=opposite, see changeset/125562191

Hi nurdafur,

Thanks for your updates.

In this changeset you added cycleway=opposite to streets that have already oneway:bicycle=no, for example way/7126910

For the Netherlands we did clean up all cycleway=opposite and use only oneway:bicycle=no together with oneway:mofa=no and oneway:moped=no where applicable.

See cycleway=opposite#Deprecated_in_the_Netherlands and (Dutch) https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=65612

I would say cycleway=opposite is deprecated

Thanks for adding the details and updating the note!

Hi Shwgu,

Thanks for adding this road, but you forgot to add the crossing of the cycleway, see also the warning above "warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway"

Can you correct that?

Greetings,

Martin.

No problem, this kind of information flows slow within the OSM community.

Happy mapping!

Hi nurdafur,

In this changeset you added cycleway=opposite to way/533253274/history and way/142906940/history

But cycleway=opposite has been deprecated at least for the Netherlands, see osm.wiki/Tag%3Acycleway%3Dopposite#Deprecated_in_the_Netherlands

I think it is actually beter to remove cycleway=opposite for sure if there is oneway:bicycle=no, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=63464

Bedankt voor de heldere commit message, duidelijk waarom.

Toch is foot=no hier niet juist, een voetganger mag gewoon over het fietspad lopen als er geen apart voetpad is.

Zie ook https://verkeersregels.vvn.nl/rvv/hoofdstuk-ii/ss-1/artikel-4

Het is wel mogelijk in OSM om aan te geven dat dit een fietspad is zonder apart voetpad toe te voegen mbv "foot=yes" + "segregated=no"

Ja, de buslijnen over de Hogeweg heb ik omgelegd maar die van de Flierbeeksingel naar de Stadsring heb ik dit keer over het hoofd gezien

Yes, thanks for the feedback!

Hi Komяpa,

I had a look at relation/8250313/history#map=17/53.89998/27.55048 but after this change this relation is missing a via and to member and has only a from member.

Can you correct that?

Greetings!

Hi Princeps,

relation/10300222
relation/10313976

I like to update (Я люблю обновляться:)

day_off=monday;friday
day_on=thursday;sunday
hour_off=14:00
hour_on=08:00

to:

restriction=conditional = no_entry @ (Mo-Th;Fr-Su 08:00-14:00)

is that the correct translation? (это правильный перевод?)

Greetings (Приветствую!)

With this changeset, relation/13904140 got no from/via/to ways/node.

Can you have a look and correct that?

Corrected.

Yes, correct, that is an error by me, let me correct it, thanks for the feedback!

Zoals geschreven in de note:

Nee, dit is een foutje doordat de Verkeersbordenkaart, https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=51.937556632&lng=4.471829862&z=19 aan gaf dat er een C3 bord aan het begin stond.

De informatie over dat bord is echter bij nader inzien verkeerd en hoort bij de Ackersdijkstraat.

Opgelost met changeset/120718633

Hi,

Restriction relation/13804593 has no type, restriction=""

Not sure what it should be, can you correct it?

Thanks

Not only because there is cyclestreet=yes but also because there is bicycle_road=yes