emersonveenstra's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 130014833 | about 3 years ago | Hi, I'm curious about the trails in Heritage Park that you deleted. They were created not that long ago, and public GPS traces show people using some form of trails. Are they really non-existent, or are they just not official or not supposed to be used? |
| 129980736 | about 3 years ago | Hi, Please don't delete features like fairways if you're just going to recreate the same thing. That is not fair to the person who originally made the fairway, since you're removing the work they put into it for no reason. Thanks! |
| 129994769 | about 3 years ago | Hi! Thanks for your contributions to OSM. Just as a tip, please add access=private to backyard swimming pools so it's clear they aren't meant for public use. Thanks! |
| 129903560 | about 3 years ago | Hi, Thank you for your contribution, however, please split up your changesets so that they don't span the entire united states, this makes it impossible to do QA checks on your changes. Keeping it to one state or less, except for documented imports or cleanups, is a good rule of thumb. Thanks!
|
| 129875532 | about 3 years ago | Hi, You appear to have drawn over the Sandwich street that was already there. Could you please delete your changes and add the missing attributes to the already existing version of the street? Thanks! |
| 129880038 | about 3 years ago | Hi again! A couple more quick tips, if you are wondering how to tag something, clicking the feature type and searching in there will usually give you what you're looking for, so if you were to type in "daycare" you would see the Nursery/Childcare preset, which is what you're looking for here.
|
| 129879798 | about 3 years ago | Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM! One thing to note, generally a rule of thumb is we don't put duplicate information on points and buildings. So since you already have amenity=cafe, outdoor_seating=yes, and the names of the shops on the points, the building shouldn't have any of those tags, it can just have building=retail |
| 129796384 | about 3 years ago | way/1119956704 way/1119956703
|
| 129693483 | about 3 years ago | Okay, thanks for the clarification |
| 129693483 | about 3 years ago | Right, but does it actually contain water? If it doesn't contain water, then it's not a water hazard, by definition |
| 129774518 | about 3 years ago | Looks good to me, thanks for your contribution!
|
| 129773994 | about 3 years ago | way/1119799831 and the "buildings" next to it are not buildings, they are boxes. You also placed them directly on top of a road, which should have given you a clue that they are not buildings.
|
| 129779623 | about 3 years ago | once again, you are saying things are buildings when they are not. Please go through all of your recent changesets and fix your mistakes. Use more than one unique aerial imagery and ensure that you are mapping and tagging correctly |
| 129779755 | about 3 years ago | reverted in changeset/129782313 |
| 129779755 | about 3 years ago | I'm reverting this changeset, none of these are buildings, they are trucks. Please use more than one unique aerial imagery source when you edit. |
| 129781399 | about 3 years ago | way/1119839274 and way/1119839275 appear to be trees, not buildings? |
| 129610728 | about 3 years ago | Hi, Thank you for your contribution to OSM! Please note that opening hours have very strict syntax requirements, please either read the syntax here: opening_hours=* or use the graphical tool here: https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ to fix the ones in the businesses you created, thanks! |
| 129693483 | about 3 years ago | Are you sure that way/1119278930 is a water hazard? There's no water in any of the aerial imagery |
| 129630374 | about 3 years ago | In the whole day between when i contacted you and i contacted the DWG, you made several changesets, so you were definitely active on here and able to read your emails. I wouldnt have contacted the DWG, nor would they block you, if you hadnt been actively mapping after my comment, because you're right, no one is expected to be on all the time. |
| 129684104 | about 3 years ago | Hi again!
|