emersonveenstra's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 130078291 | about 3 years ago | Hi, Thanks for your contributions. I would recommend you learn about multipolygons, so that you can more accurately map landuse, and properly exempt things like the farmland/grassland and ponds from the wooded areas. See osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon for details
|
| 130079107 | about 3 years ago | Why did you delete the fuel station and warehouse?
|
| 130083263 | about 3 years ago | Oh, also phone numbers must include the country code |
| 130083263 | about 3 years ago | Hi, Thank you for your contributions! opening hours have a strict syntax requirement, please see the wiki examples here: opening_hours=*#Simple_examples and the generator here: https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/
|
| 130056754 | about 3 years ago | Hi, Thanks for your contribution! A couple of notes on way/1095036118
Thanks! |
| 130074642 | about 3 years ago | Hi, please don't use the name tag for personal use
|
| 130074910 | about 3 years ago | Hi! Thanks for contributing. A couple of notes: If you're adding a building inside a building, you need to use building:part=* and not abuse the layer tag. Also, while it's not explicitly forbidden, a standard value for the building:part tag will allow more renderers to know what it is. |
| 130068352 | about 3 years ago | Hi, This changeset drew a new road overtop of an existing road. Please fix this, thanks! |
| 129662340 | about 3 years ago | Road names must not be abbreviated in OSM, could you please fix this? Thanks! |
| 130036601 | about 3 years ago | Hi, A couple things:
Thanks! |
| 128859509 | about 3 years ago | Hi! Just a quick note for the future, when you're editing traffic signals in iD, it's a good idea to hide landuses and boundaries. Several traffic signals i fixed from this changeset were added to the admin boundary, not the road. |
| 128207874 | about 3 years ago | Hi, Can you please fix the website on way/1107938636
|
| 130018917 | about 3 years ago | thanks! |
| 129915813 | about 3 years ago | Hi, When you use highway=proposed, you can't use the construction tag, you have to use the proposed tag (see highway=proposed?uselang=en) |
| 130011985 | about 3 years ago | You removed the highway tag from way/221656349, please fix it. Thanks |
| 130018917 | about 3 years ago | and also this landuse node/6298603454 |
| 130018917 | about 3 years ago | Hi, Looks like you accidentally dragged a corner of this building: way/946960719
|
| 130019217 | about 3 years ago | Hi, In OSM, there's a principle called osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element, which means that, for example, you shouldn't draw a cycleway on a service road. The cycle route was already connected by the service road, so there's no need to draw anything else to connect it. Would you mind deleting that? Thanks! |
| 130014833 | about 3 years ago | Okay, so the problem with that is you're going to remove them, and someone else is going to put them back, then you're going to remove them, in an infinite loop. The correct way to deal with these kinds of trails is to add the tags access=no and informal=yes. That way everyone knows that they aren't meant to be used |
| 130014833 | about 3 years ago | *Some form of trails in those locations |