reverted in changesets 120893563, 120893628, and 120893652 for creating thousands of untagged nodes

reverted in changesets 120893563, 120893628, and 120893652 for adding thousands of untagged nodes

reverted in changesets 120893563, 120893628, and 120893652

Hi,

This changeset added a ton of nodes with no information. Are you planning to do anything with these nodes?

Hi,

This changeset added a few trees that are on top of a building (node/9719590228 node/9719590229 node/9719590203) If they were mistakes, could you please move/remove them, or if they weren't, could you please make sure you add the appropriate tags for indoor? Thanks!

This changeset reverts changesets: 120517375,120517286,120517262,120517115,120514532,120513789,120512697,120512206,120511959,120511370,120511067,120510328

reverted in changeset/120517379

Note that when I say vandalism, I mean OSM's definition osm.wiki/Vandalism "is intentionally ignoring the consensus norms of the OpenStreetMap community about editing data"

Hi,

This is vandalism. There's no reason for deleting these. I am reverting this changeset and next time will be reporting to the DWG. Sorry to be short, but you're erasing other people's contributions for no reason and that's just not cool. If your program can't figure out how to change data that's already there, then it's not welcome here.

Please read the wiki about deleting and recreating elements: osm.wiki/Keep_the_history

Simple areas like bunkers should never need to be deleted and redrawn

also why did you delete the bunkers?

Please make better changeset comments to describe what you're doing.

Hi,

Thanks for contributing to OSM! For this path way/1056904454 `access=yes` is not needed on a foot path, and `handicap` is for golf courses. Could you please remove those two tags?

Hi,

Thanks for contributing to OSM! Just as a note, on way/369939487, multiple values are delimited by semicolons, not commas, so it should be `cuisine=donut;ice_cream`. Would you mind quickly fixing that?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120479525

Hi,

Please don't create a random area called "Lake Michigan", and please don't add the `name` field to sections of the Lake Michigan relation. I've reverted those changes

This is not a correct use of `ref`. These are already tagged as `old_ref=US 131`, which is correct. Please revert this changeset.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120360344

Hi,

The data was correct, the addr:street value must not include the house number, and it needs to be unabbreviated. Please be more cautious before editing data next time.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120284713

Hi,

This is not oneway, by making it oneway you break routing software because they can't turn left from the minor road. Please be more cautious in the future.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120238318

Hi,

how did you decide to make this a oneway street? There's no signs or marks on the road to indicate it
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120248924

Hi,

Are you local? Last time I visited way/1037219241 it was definitely not suitable for bikes, only about 4ft wide with a 3in curb, that's why I didn't add `bicycle=yes` to it. Did that change recently?