edvac's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 107519354 | over 4 years ago | Dear fkv and m3h4: I fully reverted back the changes to what we had at the beginning: I will close this ticket, but you can open it again if you need so. Rafael, on behalf of the DWG. |
| 110106593 | over 4 years ago | Chiariamo se i dati contengono dati protetti da copyright, perché in tal caso potremmo aver bisogno di "redact" i dati (un revert non sarebbe sufficiente). Rafael Avila Coya, a nome del DWG |
| 107519354 | over 4 years ago | Dear m3h4:
Rafael Avila Coya, on behalf of the DWG. |
| 110609934 | over 4 years ago | In the case of those 2 ways, you had removed those name tags in version 3. In version 4 you kept those name deleted, but in version 5 you added them again. That's why I was puzzled about this. If those names are fake, you only have to delete them again. Regards, Rafael Avila Coya, OSMF DWG |
| 110609934 | over 4 years ago | Same for this "Haiti Injury Shelter": way/977752895 |
| 110609934 | over 4 years ago | Hi Frans S: This building [1] was tagged with name="Haiti Rescue Site" by user Eurener Harris (version 2) whom I blocked for vandalism [2]. I am curious to know why you restore that name in version 5. Rafael Avila Coya OSM Foundation Data Working Group DWG Ticket#2021090210000118 [1] way/977751686 |
| 110106593 | over 4 years ago | Caro alpigraie: Abbiamo ricevuto una lamentela sulla scarsa mappatura da parte tua al DWG, e questo è il terzo changeset in cui un utente ti chiede di rispondere alle sue domande, senza alcun feedback finora. Per favore, dacci la tua opinione sui problemi segnalati da questo utente ivanbranco, e anche sulle domande dell'utente canfe nei seguenti 2 changeset: changeset/109928109
Grazie mille in anticipo, Tradotto con www.DeepL.com/Translator (versione gratuita) Dear alpigraie: We've received a complaint about poor mapping by you at the DWG, and this is the third changeset where a user asks you to answer their questions, with no feedback so far. Please, give us your opinion about the issues pointed by this user ivanbranco, and also about the questions of user canfe in the following 2 changesets: changeset/109928109
Thank you very much in advance, Rafael Avila Coya
|
| 110285364 | over 4 years ago | Oh, I see! As the only edit was from 5 days ago, I didn't check. Thanks!! |
| 110285364 | over 4 years ago | Liebe KETirol: Sie haben https://www.kirchdorf.tirol.gv.at/ als Quelle für Ihre Kartenbearbeitungen angegeben. Ist dies eine gültige Datenquelle für die Bearbeitung in OpenStreetMap? Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Rafael Avila Coya OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group |
| 110454265 | over 4 years ago | Liebe diebasis SL: Sie wurden gewarnt, dass das Hinzufügen von politischen temporären Veranstaltungsorten zu OpenStreetMap den Rahmen des Projekts sprengen würde. Der Benutzer @nw520 hat dich zweimal gewarnt, aber du hast das ignoriert und diese Information erneut hinzugefügt. Bitte vermeiden Sie dies erneut. Wenn du Informationen über die Bearbeitung in OpenStreetMap benötigst, kann dir vielleicht nw520 helfen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Rafael Avila Coya OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group [Ticket#2021083110000173] (From issue 13613) Übersetzt mit www.DeepL.com/Translator (kostenlose Version) Dear diebasis SL: You have been warned that adding political temporary venues to OpenStreetMap is out of the scope of the project. User @nw520 has warned you about this twice, but you have ignored that, and added again that info. Please, avoid doing this again. If you need information about editing in OpenStreetMap, maybe nw520 could help you. Best regards, |
| 106605645 | over 4 years ago | Estimados Carlos Eduardo Rodríguez y mariotomo: Esta guerra constante no es nada agradable, y nada tiene que ver con el espíritu del proyecto OpenStreetMap, que es a fin de cuentas el de disfrutar mapeando. mariotomo: si ves que tus comentarios no hacen más que crear polémica, ¿no sería mejor considerar que, a lo mejor, hay formas mejores de dejar comentarios, sin tener que poner en evidencia a otros maperos? Todos cometemos errores. Rafael Avila Coya OSM Foundation Data Working Group |
| 86690493 | over 4 years ago | Estimado porfiriopaiz: El usuario [Samuel Chávez](@Samuel%20Ch%C3%A1vez) ha enviado una queja al Data Working Group acerca del borrado de dos de las cuatro rutas del bus 107 de la ciudad de Managua. El changeset en que se borraron las relaciones es este mismo en el que comento. Según él, y aporta pruebas gráficas (fotos y vídeos), existen dos rutas diferentes para el bus 107: una denominada Calvario, y la otra denominada Cementerio. La diferencia entre ambas es únicamente que la ruta Calvario pasa en ambas direcciones por el ramal que forman la 77a Calle S.O. desde la parada "Intersección de la Ruta 107" (O) hasta la parada "La Vuelta" (E) más la calle sin nombre desde "La Vuelta" (S) hasta "Plazoleta Camilo Ortega" (N), y en cambio la ruta Cementerio pasa en ambas direcciones por el ramal que forman la calle sin nombre desde la parada "Intersección de la Ruta 107" (S) hasta la parada "Camilo Ortega 2" (N) más la 70a Calle S.O. desde la parada "Camilo Ortega 2" (O) hasta la parada "Plazoleta Camilo Ortega" (E). Actualmente, la Ruta 107: Camilo Ortega -> Mercado Oriental (Cementerio)(relation/2607453) es incorrecta, pues pasa por el ramal correspondiente a Calvario. Por tanto, esta relación debe ser corregida. Además, deben restituirse las relaciones borradas, y añadirlas, junto a las otras dos, a la relación route-master del bus 107: relation/10979711
La queja fundamental del usuario Samuel Chávez es que no le han hecho caso a sus demandas de corrección, a pesar de que dice conocer bien la ruta, pues la utiliza personalmente con frecuencia. Él mismo le ha dejado un mensaje más arriba, sin hallar respuesta por su parte. Rafael Avila Coya OpenStreetMap Foundation Data Working Group Ticket#2021072310000011 |
| 94546363 | over 4 years ago | Please: Do not change the China borders unless it is in compliance with the disputed territories doc [1], approved by the OpenStreetMap Foundation in September 2013. In this changeset you have changed the China border in order to add Doklam to the chinese territory, without discussion nor agreement with the rest of the OSM community. (DeepL translation)
不要改变中国的边界,除非它符合有争议的领土 doc [1], 2013年9月由OpenStreetMap基金会批准。 在这个变更集中,你们改变了中国的边界,以便将洞朗加入中国领土,而没有与OSM社区的其他成员讨论或达成一致。 Rafael Avila Coya. OpenStreetMap Foundation. Data Working Group. [1] https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf [Ticket#2021081210000075] |
| 104596076 | over 4 years ago | Hi, ACTosamella: You have changed an unclassified way (way/199588787/history) tagging to a barrier, which is wrong. |
| 108448363 | over 4 years ago | Bonjour, carlitos gomez: Est-ce que vous pouvez écrire des commentaires sur les groupes de changements qui décrivent mieux ce que vous faites dans chaque édition. Il y a des cents d'éditions que vous décrivez avec "digitalisation", qui ne dit rien du tout. SVP, lisez cette page wiki: osm.wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications |
| 42234190 | over 4 years ago | Chèr(e) GBr: J'ai vu que vous avez uploadé autour de 58 lieux habités avec leur noms dans la zone de Farafangana, en ajoutant source=nona.net Qu'est-ce que cette source de données ? Avez vous la permission des propietaires de cette info pour l'ajouter à OSM ? Avez vous contacté la communauté locale de Madagascar pour utiliser cette source de données ? |
| 109150071 | over 4 years ago | Hi, Franklineng In OSM we map real things; we don't do any test whatsoever with the real OSM database. If you want to practice, you can use the dev servers. For example, with the iD editor you have used, you can practice in this iD dev instance: and click the red button that reads "LIVE", at the status bar at the bottom. You have more info about sandboxes to practice here: osm.wiki/Sandbox_for_editing#Experiment_with_the_API_.28advanced.29 Please, don't use again the OSM database for practicing. We had to revert all your 6 changesets. |
| 33775736 | over 4 years ago | Dear madmap77: You had added a path following the MGWR trackbed, that trespasses private land. The owner has complained about it. Do you have any evidence that the path was of public access? Greetings, Rafael Avila Coya
|
| 108799441 | over 4 years ago | Hola, jtorresriv: ¿Podrías indicar la fuente de todos estos datos? Gracias, Rafael Avila Coya
|
| 108066247 | over 4 years ago | Thank you, @Janjko. We have received a ticket at the DWG about this user edits. Please, let us know if similar issues persist. Hvala ti, Janjko. Na DWG -u smo dobili kartu o uređivanju ovog korisnika. Molimo da nas obavijestite ako slični problemi potraju. (automatic translation) Rafael Avila Coya
|