dsleonard's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 67728689 | almost 7 years ago | Might have been me, oops. (but not a year ago). |
| 62969658 | almost 7 years ago | Sorry, that comment was in reference to way:594627844 and the one east of it. Also I don't understand why you would remove bicycle=designated from the crossings at the big junction. As you know in korea it is illegal to ride a bike across a crossing unless it is designated for bikes. Those crossings are. What I did probably do wrong is call them zebras. Zebras are meant for uncontrolled crossings where pedestrians can cross any time, but this opens a bottomless can of worms apparently. |
| 62969658 | almost 7 years ago | This path certainly is bicycle designated and I've surveyed it in person for the markings. While I didn't take photos you can can verify that on naver images. Yes, closed source, like I said, though, I surveyed it. If you want verification look at the path entrance in front of the S-oil. There are no markings on the bridge west of the cemetary entrance, but I don't think we need to prove that every 100m is designated. It's a bike-allowed way, even not a very great bike way to say the least. Without a reply, I will change it back. I would also say it's foot=designated as there are pedestrian crossing signs, but that tag is never very important in Korea. |