Welcome to OSM! Your contributions are looking good so far. Just a couple comments that I think I might have found helpful when I first started out:

When you deleted the building way (way/323198533), the address tags on it were deleted as well and the new buildings don’t have any address info. Generally, it is preferable to modify an existing building rather than delete and redraw so that tags aren't lost and people can look at the history of changes: osm.wiki/Keep_the_history

In this particular case, I’m also not sure that this should be two different buildings. The street side facade across both is the same black paint and same window style, which makes me think these are the same building construction. Do you have some additional info otherwise? Either way is okay, it can always be sorted out later :-)

Hi Alex, you might want to double-check your image alignment or something as some of the trees are placed inside buildings like this one (node/11013083897) or added as part of the building way like this one (node/11013083936). Thanks!

Welcome to OSM! Thanks for the contributions - looks good so far. One suggestion when adding sidewalks is to put a node where the footway intersects with roads like service highways. This marks the features as passing through each other on the map. Some people also mark those intersection nodes with highway=crossing but other people save that label for a more official pedestrian crossing.

Anyway, welcome and I can try to help if you have any questions as you map things.

What was the source for these, especially with the id names? So far as I have seen on the ground, these cameras don’t exist in the identified locations.

Wow, fast response!

I think deleting and redrawing features is less desirable from OSM guidelines on keeping history but it’s not a big deal when there was just a basic outline to begin with or the routing is just temporarily broken. I am concerned about how it can bring some issues, for example losing info that isn’t carried to new geometry or features that get overlooked in redrawing.

As an example, way/864040209/history was deleted but the detail tags didn’t make it to the new geometry. Or way/1180249804/history was deleted without any replacement. There are others like this, and sorting out which is good/bad becomes difficult without being able to track history of a feature.

I do look forward to seeing your Uptown address work. I’ve started filling in some POIs and details but having good addresses to anchor on would be helpful.

Nice work adding in a lot of buildings and details in the area. Unfortunately this changeset introduces some problems by removing existing ways that were mapped, breaking sidewalk connections, removing history by deleting and replacing existing features, and removing detailed tags about surfaces, operational periods and other details.

I can’t seem to find a restroom at this location; it appears to be a patch of grass. Was it perhaps located in the small building nearby: way/973022152 ? This building is locked off now so it’s hard to tell.

If no objections, I’ll delete the restroom node. Thanks!

Nice work in here! Are you open to double-check on the aerial imagery alignment for these additions? I've been finding that images from Bing (and others) are not well-aligned in the Chania area. For reference, I used an offset of 6.18, 5.37 in iD for this same area.

Shop name reverted to Περαθωράκης after learning about the stylized script θ used in the shop sign.

Shop Περαδωράκης is labeled as such on the sign out front, though various review websites name it as Περαθωράκης. I changed the name and operator in deference for what is labeled at the site.

Area is vehicle-focused, used for bus turn around and taxis or other car stops. Traffic is freeform without designated lanes, so keeping area=yes. To accommodate pedestrians, access is now flagged for foot and bicycle, plus a linking footway from the steps to the routable service highway.

The single POI for both Senses Boutique Hotel and Anestis is now just Senses Boutique Hotel as there was no appearance of Anestis in the Senses Boutique grounds.

Source should have been survey

Without comment on accuracy, height is a direction reversion to previous value taken from changeset/49749938

Area formerly tagged by basin is walkable and cannot hold water. The southern-most fountain sprays from ground and drains without any standing water.

Change set comment got mixed up, should have been: Add Chania shops