OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
17125269 almost 7 years ago

Hi stanton,
Thanks for the fast response. I was at the pass on snow shoes last Saturday, so I did see the Aria structures as well. I mapped some of the hiking routes yesterday. That's when I bumped into the phone in the middle of nowhere.
May it be a good idea to also move the phone somewhere closer to the OSM location of the tunnel?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

17125269 almost 7 years ago

Hi stanton,
I am wondering how a phone you placed [1] about 250m from the actual location of the tunnel improves the tunnel mapping. I seriously doubt that the phone is 250 meters west of the tunnel.
Could you please elaborate?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
[1] node/2399338112

66753390 almost 7 years ago

Hi Suse41,

Whenever you hit the Save button in iD editor, on the left side of the screen a menu appears where you can enter information about the sources you used for the edits.
I'm not too familiar with iD editor, since I use another editor myself, but most likely it automatically fills some fields based on the last values you used.
However, every time you save, you should update these fields to reflect what you actually used.
Please have a detailed look there and familiarize yourself with how you should fill those fields correctly.
A good way to get a bit more familiar is doing the iD walkthrough, which you can find via de ? mark button on the right side when you are in edit mode.
I hope this helps.
Cheers,
Raymond

66753390 almost 7 years ago

Hi Suse41,

You always present your imagery used as Bing aerial and gpx data file. However looking at your entries it does not look like you actually had a gpx. May this be a comment you forgot to remove? Please try to always give correct source information as it helps others to interpret your contributions.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

64213501 about 7 years ago

Ich nehme an das dieser Wanderweg gehört zu die gelb markierte Wanderwegen. Darum schlage ich vor die folgende tags zuzufugen:
symbol=gelbe Raute
osmc:symbol=yellow::yellow_diamond
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel

5306808 about 7 years ago

Hi schmandr,
Thank you for your extensive reply. I already understood from reading somewhere that national route 5 is supposed to be the main part of E4 in Switzerland. Since I hiked the first three stages from Dielsdorf to Hauenstein and never saw a marking for E4, my doubts started. After cyling east of Dielsdorf on Friday, to capture some lwn relations :), also did not deliver any proof I thought is was time to figure out what was going on.
I may have missed the additional signs you refer to though, since there are often more non-hiking signs on the poles I generally ignore any non-yellow signs. So I may have missed them.
I guess we should leave the E4 on OSM then. I've added a note to the relation about this discussion.
And I doublechecked, you created v1 of E4 Schweiz here [1].
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
[1] changeset/4996431

5306808 about 7 years ago

Hi schmandr,
By now I have passed along quite a few places where the E4 is mapped in Switzerland [1] here at OSM, but so far I have not found the E4 to be signposted anywhere in the real world.
This seems to violate the principle: Verifiable - means that others can go there and see for themselves if your data is correct (see [2]).
Since you started this relation and added at least a few of the stretches which I passed along and could not find any signposting, could you please enlighten me about the source of your information?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
[1] relation/963212
[2] osm.wiki/How_We_Map

64213501 about 7 years ago

Hallo skorbut,
Vielleicht kannst du die Route Relation anreicheren mit mehr Details. Sehe folgende Wiki Seite für relevante Tags:
osm.wiki/Switzerland/HikingNetwork#Recommended_tagging_2
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel

64873816 about 7 years ago

changeset comment is incorrect copy from previous CS. I adapted routing here to gpx and added a track

46893409 about 7 years ago

Could you please inform us what is the attraction here? Isn't this just the name of a hamlet and wouldn't place=hamlet be a better tag than tourism=attraction?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

8642661 about 7 years ago

So, I am curious on what source you based the religion tag of this mountain shelter:
way/30708117

57968219 about 7 years ago

Hey Stefan,
I think you accidentally messed up highway 32446434. You can see the zigzag you created very clearly here on achavi:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=57968219
Be aware when working with iD editor that everytime you click in the window, you may accidentally drag a node or way.
I've corrected this in the following changeset:
changeset/62987083
Keep up the happy mapping!
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

61885413 over 7 years ago

Hallo BAK365,
Genau, ein blöder Fehler :-). Ich habs korrigiert und den Sattel ungefähr positioniert mit fixme Markierung:
changeset/62345232
Vielen Dank für die Aufmerksamkeit.
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel

53335711 over 7 years ago

Hi Gianfranco2014,
You state a survey as source for this edit, and following edits of the Tappa D09 relation [1].
I traced your 'steps' on 24 September 2018, but did not see a single trail blazing or signpost that marked the Sentiero Italia.
Could you please elaborate on what you actually surveyed?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

[1] relation/7690606

62199954 over 7 years ago

Incorrect changeset description. Highways were aligned, waterways created and some place nodes added

31907360 over 7 years ago

Nope, not a tourism=alpine_hut either... You cannot sleep here, the building is farm. I've changed it to place=farm.
I spotted a lot of tourism=alpine_hut nodes with name "Alp X" in Engiadina Bassa which I think most are just farm. With Alp typically and alpine meadow is meant, most of the time with some kind of building. The farmer takes the animals up the mountain in the summer months. Some of them have rooms/beds for guests, most of them don't though. It seems the tourism=alpine_hut tag is not always well understood by some.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

59201583 over 7 years ago

`Hmm, the DigitalGlobe Standard Vintage layer shows 2012-08-15 at this spot in JOSM. The Mapilarry imagery seems to match with the areal imagery though. Apparently the DigitalGlobe Standard Vintage layer is not updated... Sorry for making a fuss.

61472250 over 7 years ago

Hi Krake User,
These changes also look good. Nice to have such recent imagery. Here in Kanton Zürich we still struggle with 2014/5 imagery...
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

61473649 over 7 years ago

Hi Krake User,
You tickmarked the review option, so I had a look. I think you did a good job.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

60349999 over 7 years ago

Hi Krake User,
Could you please respond to the question.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel