Also, I see via Achavi [1] that you significantly altered this way [2] and completely removed another [3]. Again, I would like to know what your sources for these changes are. Could you please elaborate?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

[1] https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=65662150
[2] way/594149001
[3] way/594149004

Hallo Voonosm,
In this changeset you have changed the hiking route relation Scheidegg - Schattentafel by removed two ways from it and adding two others. I wonder how you can have the info to 'Couchmap' this, as it can typically only be found on the ground. Could you please share information about the source you used for this edit?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi Voonosm,
Couchmapping is dangerous especially in the (high)mountains. The imagery is so much skewed here that at maximum it gives a general idea of the shapes but says nothing about actual positions. In this changeset you moved Fridlispitz and aligned it to the imagery. However a survey by myself on Sunday revealed that the position before your edit was pretty accurate and yours is about 50 meters off.
Please keep this in mind for your next couchmapping adventure :-).
I have made corrections, visible here:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70937423
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

changeset comment mistake, it should be:
created and split routes, added guideposts and separated guideposts from highway nodes.

Thanks for the addition :-)

Hi Karl,
Thanks for the fast reply. Closes to Friendship Road that I have been was Taiwan, so still far from nearby...
I understand that attraction is applicable here. Maybe the highway [1] should also be tagged as Friendship Road. Do you know which section is exactly named like this?
Cheers,
Raymond
[1] way/27109728

Hi Gudetama17,
Thanks for heling out with project 5509. I notice you have drawn a lot of buildings, and they have all kinds of funny shapes. Most of the time building are rectangular though. iD editor has a fast way to do this, after you finished drawing the four points of the building you can push 'S' on the keyboard and the the corners are nicely squared.
Keep up the happy mapping!
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

I mean this node:
node/6284163486

Hi Karl,
You've added Friendship Road as an attraction in this changeset. From the name it sounds like this is not an attraction, but more like the name of a highway.
If that is the case, then the name should be applied to the way, not with a separate node. This is however not something you can do via maps.ME.
Could you please update me. If required I can help you with instructions.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Sehr gut! Ich versteh aber nicht genau was du meinst mit 'in destruction'? Wird der weg abgerissen?

Linien kann mann Teilen bei Knoten. In iD Editor selektiert mann erstmal die Linie, danach kann mann den spezifischen Knot betätigen mit der rechte Maustaste und gibt es die Option 'Split' mit eine Schere. Dann wird die Linie bei den Knot geteilt und gibt es danach zwei separate Linien.
Gruss,
dikkeknodel

Gerne. Ich habe erstmal die Wurm [1] geteilt bei die zwei Knoten unten und oben die zwei Strassen. Danach habe ich das neue mittlere Teil [2] der Wurm die Tags tunnel=yes und layer=-1 gegeben.
Gruss, dikkeknodel
[1] way/31199472
[2] way/691064215

Hi balducien,
You added a turning loop in this changeset. It wasn't connected to the actual highway however but just floating loose. Be sure to always connect this with a highway node.
I've done so now
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
changeset/69948172

Zürich ist doch wirklich irgendwo anderes...

Thanks for updating in changeset/65517628

Source declaration is incorrect, it should be:
website of the operator for section cut info, and logic of finding the location on the map :)

Hi Marcel,
Thanks for the reply. I changed it as follows:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=68643844
Cheers,
Raymond

Hi KDS,
In this changeset you positioned the Tüfels Chilen viewpoint node exactly on the Tüfels Chilen limestone deposit, which is a protected area not to be accessed according to the signs around it. Since a viewpoint implies that people can stand there, while looking at something else, this seems not the most appropriate tagging or location.
I suggest to tag it as waterfall instead, since it it sort of a waterfall. If you want to remain it as a viewpoint, it should be on the path.
What do you think?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

You really dive into this. Unfortunately such data cannot be used for OSM.

Nice work, thanks!