Hi zwis,
Are you sure these buildings are actually here?
The DigitalGlobe Standard Imagery you used is from 2012-08-15 according to the vintage layer (available in JOSM editor). The Esri World Imagery and DigitalGlobe Premium imagery (which are typically more recent) show different buildings here.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi km2bp,
My proposed implementation is already corrected by another mapper. You can see the route relation here:
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=8493528
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi Benno,
Thanks for getting back.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi EnterChallenger,
I like benches more than parking spaces :-).
A few hints:
With surfaces like these you should try to map only the actual surface as you can see on the imagery, not completely fill up the area between the roads. Roads are drawn as lines and therefore are 0 m wide, they get their width by defining lanes and road type. Additional benefit of not drawing over the roads is that it is clearer to distinguish in the editor.
------------
You use the tag amenity=parking_space [1] which is for single spaces (1 car), but I think amenity=parking [2] is more applicable since that is meant for multiple places.
----------------------
For parking, especially in the city, specifying the parking fee is very relevant to most motorists. Check the wiki [2] for more relevant tags.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
[1] amenity=parking%20space?uselang=en-GB
[2] amenity=parking

You can never have enough of them! Cheers, dikkeknodel

Hi EnterChallenger,
Benches are my favourite!
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi EnterChallenger,
These additions look good.
To make them even more valuable you can also add information like phone number and website for example.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi EnterChallenger,
These changes look good!
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi EnterChallenger,
Just like in other changesets you add a duplicate [1] here of a park which was already on the map 9 years ago [2]. Is that only because Parc La Grange should be spelled Parc Lagrange?
I seems you are wasting your time with these actions. If you don't clean up incorrect tagging but just put features on top the map will just become a big mess.
I can quickly revert these changes for you, if you supply me the correct name of the park.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
[1] way/613902407
[2] way/35278455

Ich habe auch der tourism=alpine_hut Markierung entfernt bei die beiden Berghütten der SAC im Gebiet, weil auch geschlossen sind seit der Bergsturz.
changeset/61409318

Ich habe schon der name:nl verbessert :-).

Hi Elapsus,
"Fermata tram 10 per Bahnhofplatz" is not really relevant on this node. It has therefore been removed [1].
Cheers, dikkeknode
[1]changeset/61139815

Hi Kat,
This place was already on the map [1]. So I have removed the one you added.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
[1] node/5456480438

Hi BokitoBrew,
Why did you use the ' ' in the name, what does it mean?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi BokitoBrew,
Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I've had a look at your changes. My knowledge of French is limited but I assume Crete means ridge. Is this really the name of the path, or should this actually be mapped as a separate ridge [1]?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
[1] natural=ridge

Oh wait, the above comment is actually for another of your changesets: changeset/61400435

Hi BokitoBrew,
Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I've had a look at your changes. My knowledge of French is limited but I assume Crete means ridge. Is this really the name of the path, or should this actually be mapped as a separate ridge [1]?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
[1] natural=ridge

Jetzt brauch wir noch jemandem der das Pfad weiter untersucht :-).
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel

Hallo hmpf99
Weil du der Reviewbox angekreuzt hast, habe ich mir deine Änderungen angeschaut. Es seht gut aus.
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel

Hi Daniel,
Great work here to!
Cheers,
dikkeknodel