Hi Daniel,
Thanks for contributing to OSM. Since you tickmarked the review box I had a look at your changes. Good that you take notice of new buildings. On the Solothurn imagery they're not yet there, so someone on the ground is very valuable. Thankns for the lookout!
Keep up the good work.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi EnterChallenger,
Same question here, especially 'Streetart' and 'Vase' seem to be descriptions, or categories of art, not the actual name. Especially since you use them both twice it seems like it's not the name. See also on the wiki [1]
Can you clarify?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
[1] name=*#Additional_data

Hi EnterChallenger,
With artworks it is always a bit confusing whether the description is the name or not. Hence I am just asking. Is this artwork really called 'Chaussure en fer' (iron shoe if I understand correctly) or is that just the description?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi EnterChallenger,
I think I already commented on another changeset regarding this square. From the imagery I see paths, so I don't understand why you remove the highway=pedestrian and area=yes tag. Could you explain what you try to do?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi EnterChallenger,
The church you added here [1] was already on the map [2]. It's good to add address details, but these can be added to the existing feature. Can you merge the new information into [2] and remove [1]?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
[1] node/3685298489
[2] way/78492654

Hey EnterChallenger,
Looks good, if you want to make it even completer you could also add other info like opening hours and website. This will greatly help those desperately looking for a club that is still open ;-).
When you go to the wiki page for night club [1] a list is given of relevant additional tags. For many other tags similar pages exist. The wiki is a really valuable source to find which tags may be relevant or are common.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
[1] amenity=nightclub?uselang=en-GB

Hi EnterChallenger,
Perfect, you added a tag to an existing building.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi EnterChallenger,
Is Parc de la HEAD actually the name, or is this more a description (it sound like it, but French is not my best know language)? If it is more a description, I would suggest to put it in a description tag.
Additionally, park seems to be a bit overrated looking from the imagery. It seems to be a paved area with 3 trees, and there are even cars parked. Has that changed?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi EnterChallenger,
You created 2 areas of grass [1, 2], but these do not match with what is visible on the imagery. I would advice to only map the area that is actually grass, while now it also covers the area where the street is.
On a positive note, the footways through Parc des Tranchées look good.
At Parc au Croisement there was already an area drawn [3] with the same shape as the park you have added [4]. The tagging could just have been added to the existing area.
Do I describe my suggesting in an understand way?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

[1] way/613892401
[2] way/613892400
[3] way/77945329
[4] way/613892404

Hi EnterChallenger,
There is already a building here [1] and a node for a school HEAD [2] and on top you've drawn the same shape with the tags for the university [3]. If you want to add the info for the uni, you could have just updated these details within [2] instead of drawing another shape.
I've already corrected this in a changeset [4].
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
[1] way/206183971
[2] node/975264548
[3] way/613890345
[4] changeset/61406038

Hi EnterChallenger,
Here again you draw new areas that are already on the map. What are you trying to achieve?
Parc de Tranchées was already on the map for 8 years [1] and you add another one [2].
Please clarify what you intent to achieve here and maybe we can work out how to do it properly :-).
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
[1] way/77945334
[2] way/613889094
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi EnterChallenger,
Why are you adding another square on top of already existing squares?
Square Rodolphe Töpffer already exists as pedestrian area [1], you added a square [2].
It is possible to add names to existing features when those names are missing.
[1] way/78492668
[2] way/613888381

Hi EnterChallenger,
I see you added a promenade as park. Overlapping, there is already a pedestrian area with the same name [1] and a construction zone [2] and a service highway [3]. I think this is not making it clearer and some cleanup is required.
Is the construction area no longer under construction an now part of the promenade? If you can walk (nearly) everywhere, then a highway=pedestrian area may be more applicable than a park. If you can (or are allowed) only to walk certain lanes, then a park is more applicable in combination with for example footways where you can walk.
Is it clear what I mean and do you know how to proceed.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
[1] way/48915627
[2] way/81088250
[3] way/178563933

Hi EnterChallenger,
It is not clear what you are trying to achieve here. The Italian consulate was already on the map, the building [1] and a node for the consulate function [2]. You have drawn an additional building that does not match the shape of the actual building [3].
The same applies for the museum and the conservatory, for those the building also existed, only the function conservatory was not yet mapped.
Is it clear what I mean? Do you need help correcting this?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
[1] way/179836798
[2] ttps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1469680980
[3] way/613885239

Hi EnterChallenger,
I think something went wrong in this change. The new building you created [1] for the Musée des arts d'Extrême-Orient seems to be non existing. There is already a building drawn on the map that seems to better fit the actual building visible on the imagery [2]. If you just wanted to add the museum, a node which has the same tagging (except building=yes) would be sufficient.
I see there are also 2 other museum tags within building [2], both for Fondatio Baur. I assume at least one is double. Do you know if there are 2 museums in the building?
Can you correct this?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
[1] way/613883016
[2] way/179836807

Hi EnterChallenger,
These changes look good too.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi EnterChallenger,
Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. You asked for a review, therefor I have looked at your changes. These changes seem to be sensible.
Cheers, dikkeknodel

Hi wololo666,
You asked for a review. It seems default to give to enter the building nr. as name at CERN. I guess this fits then :-).
Keep up the happy mapping!
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

source is incorrect, should only be 'survey on location'

I right, I have never used Potlatch... Everything is corrected now :-).
Keep up the happy mapping!