There are no sharrows, and if there's any signs that this is a shared road, I haven't seen them...and I'm pretty sure the drivers haven't either, on this stretch.

I've always found this part of sloat unnerving, because there is no bike lane, no sharrows (what would it mean on a road this fast anyway?), nothing.

harmonize tags to "asphalt" from "paved"

checked the photography, add speed limit data.

checked the photography, add speed limit data.

abide obsolete tag warning

change the speed limit to be conditional

change the speed limit to be conditional

fix up the tags to suggest only foot access is permissive.

the paths are open when not in use, e.g. in summers, outside of school hours, etc.

this playground is open when not in use, e.g. in summers, outside of school hours, etc.

able to see all four stops from the midpoint

reviewing more photography: it's actually an all-way stop

reviewed the photography. Yup, it's a stop sign.

counted them.

trace a slightly more inclusive parking area. Otherwise the service road that addressed it crossed it somewhat chaotically which is confusing.

adding parking area data

add this missing footpath. You can see how the situation evolved by using different imagery, the building it is near is new, but it had a prior existence as well.

add some more sidewalks, for the benefit of adding paths, to better show ways to access the local school

I've been informed that these are bona-fide bicycle lanes, i.e. not for parking, breakdowns, etc.