confusedbuffalo's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 136376600 | about 2 years ago | I've just noticed this, but what you did and what you said you did are not at all the same. You made it so that way/400750666 was no longer a school, so I have now fixed that. You didn't edit any roads here however |
| 48629348 | about 2 years ago | See note/4012784
|
| 137576451 | about 2 years ago | You may have opposed the change, but there was an approved proposal for the change to emergency=water_rescue
|
| 144424611 | about 2 years ago | Thank you, I've opened note/4003342 just in case it gets forgotten about |
| 144424411 | about 2 years ago | Thank you, however Google StreetView MUST not be used as a source for any edits. Their terms are clear on that, so it is copyright violation. That change, at least, will need to be redacted.
|
| 144424611 | about 2 years ago | Thank you, but now there are two number 44s next to each other, is that really how it is, or do the later numbers need changing too? |
| 142888602 | about 2 years ago | I don't know, why do you think it is? |
| 144166597 | about 2 years ago | Thank you for adding this, I have now added an area for the school and added some details to that as well. |
| 144169053 | about 2 years ago | I should have put in my changeset comment that I was checking https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/postcode-offsets/ to fix postcodes. This is well within TF9 3.. and the rest of TF9 2JQ is much further down the road, so it was a reasonable change based on that evidence. People and businesses frequently get postcodes wrong. I have apparently misunderstood the accuracy of the NSUL data. I can't say it's surprising that the OSM search shows this location for that postcode when this was the only object tagged with that postcode. Also, your changeset comment is needlessly passive aggressive. |
| 123909163 | about 2 years ago | Sorry for the delay, there were some seemingly incorrect postcodes added here. I have now fixed them: changeset/144154120 |
| 119777268 | about 2 years ago | The addition of the postcode was not me, but I have now fixed it |
| 133927677 | about 2 years ago | I wonder if this got matched with the wrong one?
|
| 134018762 | about 2 years ago | Hello, please see note/3988816 about Turkish Delight that you added here |
| 144097005 | about 2 years ago | Also fixed some postcodes which crept into this changeset, from NSUL |
| 141416025 | about 2 years ago | Hello I was looking at https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/postcode-offsets/ and found node/11199560490 which you added here It isn't matching anything though: https://osm.mathmos.net/postoffice/progress/AB/#8/57.246/-2.720 And the Tomintoul PO there has a slightly different address. Can you take a look? |
| 143930561 | about 2 years ago | Maybe they will respond to one of the notes, otherwise I guess it doesn't matter so much for now. |
| 143930561 | about 2 years ago | Do you think any of the tomb tags would fit here? Perhaps tomb=vault? |
| 143750582 | about 2 years ago | Actually note/3646698 |
| 143643725 | about 2 years ago | Sorry, and remove a duplicate name, they were meant to be separate changesets |
| 142856118 | about 2 years ago | Hello, your edits are appreciated but please use comments that describe what you are changing and why. This edit had nothing to do with updating brands, as far as I can see. I see that this is far from the first time that you have been asked this. |