OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
136376600 about 2 years ago

I've just noticed this, but what you did and what you said you did are not at all the same.

You made it so that way/400750666 was no longer a school, so I have now fixed that.

You didn't edit any roads here however

48629348 about 2 years ago

See note/4012784
Can this be changed to shop=convenience?

137576451 about 2 years ago

You may have opposed the change, but there was an approved proposal for the change to emergency=water_rescue
osm.wiki/Proposal:Emergency=water_rescue

144424611 about 2 years ago

Thank you, I've opened note/4003342 just in case it gets forgotten about

144424411 about 2 years ago

Thank you, however Google StreetView MUST not be used as a source for any edits. Their terms are clear on that, so it is copyright violation. That change, at least, will need to be redacted.
note/3615142

144424611 about 2 years ago

Thank you, but now there are two number 44s next to each other, is that really how it is, or do the later numbers need changing too?

142888602 about 2 years ago

I don't know, why do you think it is?

144166597 about 2 years ago

Thank you for adding this, I have now added an area for the school and added some details to that as well.

144169053 about 2 years ago

I should have put in my changeset comment that I was checking https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/postcode-offsets/ to fix postcodes.

This is well within TF9 3.. and the rest of TF9 2JQ is much further down the road, so it was a reasonable change based on that evidence. People and businesses frequently get postcodes wrong.

I have apparently misunderstood the accuracy of the NSUL data.

I can't say it's surprising that the OSM search shows this location for that postcode when this was the only object tagged with that postcode.

Also, your changeset comment is needlessly passive aggressive.

123909163 about 2 years ago

Sorry for the delay, there were some seemingly incorrect postcodes added here. I have now fixed them: changeset/144154120

119777268 about 2 years ago

The addition of the postcode was not me, but I have now fixed it

133927677 about 2 years ago

I wonder if this got matched with the wrong one?
The postcode and UPRN do not match this location

134018762 about 2 years ago

Hello, please see note/3988816 about Turkish Delight that you added here

144097005 about 2 years ago

Also fixed some postcodes which crept into this changeset, from NSUL

141416025 about 2 years ago

Hello

I was looking at https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/postcode-offsets/ and found node/11199560490 which you added here

It isn't matching anything though: https://osm.mathmos.net/postoffice/progress/AB/#8/57.246/-2.720

And the Tomintoul PO there has a slightly different address.

Can you take a look?

143930561 about 2 years ago

Maybe they will respond to one of the notes, otherwise I guess it doesn't matter so much for now.

143930561 about 2 years ago

Do you think any of the tomb tags would fit here?

historic=tomb

Perhaps tomb=vault?

143750582 about 2 years ago

Actually note/3646698

143643725 about 2 years ago

Sorry, and remove a duplicate name, they were meant to be separate changesets

142856118 about 2 years ago

Hello, your edits are appreciated but please use comments that describe what you are changing and why. This edit had nothing to do with updating brands, as far as I can see.

I see that this is far from the first time that you have been asked this.