OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
143308150 about 2 years ago

Postcode does not match the location for
node/11297570250

I'm finding these through https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/postcode-offsets/ and the top ones are all post offices. If you have recent familiarity with PO data, then maybe you would be best to fix things

143027342 about 2 years ago

Another postcode error, maybe more problems as well

143306179 about 2 years ago

The name of this post office and the post office website link do not match, nor does the postcode with this location

143390165 about 2 years ago

Hello, thank you for trying to improve the map by adding your business, however you haven't got it quite right.

You can't change existing things like landuse and towns into your shop but should instead add a new object.

However, it sounds like your business is mobile so I am not sure of the best way to map it. See also note/3965458

Let me know if you can provide more information or need help with how to map your business.

I have reverted these changes in changeset/143436064 and changeset/143436146

141929450 about 2 years ago

Ok, thank you for that, next time it would be helpful to put something like that in your changeset comment to help other mappers understand what you are doing.

I asked because I saw loads of notes like note/3446080 in the area. So it seems that the fire hydrants were created through Organic Maps, and possibly as some sort of personal bookmark. It looks like the notes are references for the hydrants, but if the hydrants do not exist then perhaps the user was trying to achieve something else.

141929450 about 2 years ago

Hello, why have you deleted all of the fire hydrants? That is nothing like what your changeset description says you were doing.

142628814 about 2 years ago

Something strange happened here with creating multipolygons for Westbourne Road and some of the steps, I think I have fixed them, but I don't know how it happened in the first place

135614866 about 2 years ago

Hello, I am only just noticing this now, but in this changeset (and possibly others as well) you appear to have deleted some of the narrow gauge railways here. For example, way/587233598/history
I know for a fact that this still exists, so can I ask if you surveyed the location when making this edit? Your changeset description does not give me any detail.

141081675 about 2 years ago

Hi, you added an area for Upper Crust here: way/1206725187

There are a couple of slightly old notes saying it's not here, but maybe it was just being rebuilt, can you confirm?

note/3630429
note/3826113

140635940 over 2 years ago

Apologies, I did notice shortly after and reverted in changeset/140636629

140635947 over 2 years ago

Apologies, I did notice shortly after and reverted in changeset/140636629

140635888 over 2 years ago

Apologies, I did notice shortly after and reverted in changeset/140636629

140635901 over 2 years ago

Apologies, I did notice shortly after and reverted in changeset/140636629

140635953 over 2 years ago

Apologies, I did notice shortly after and reverted in changeset/140636629

140635918 over 2 years ago

Apologies, I did notice shortly after and reverted in changeset/140636629

139315844 over 2 years ago

Be careful not to accept all of the changes all of the time. Here the nursery is under the same code as a number of other schools and so it picked up details from there. I've reverted some of the changes

139288002 over 2 years ago

Thanks, I've added the edubase ref for Northumberland PRU. The other one doesn't seem to have one, but wouldn't necessarily.
Interestingly both of them seem to list their address as "Pitt Lane", not "Pit Lane". Did you capture the road name in your survey?

130163905 over 2 years ago

Hi, when you edited Saint James Preparatory School here, you added the website and ref:edubase of a school in London
Do you have local knowledge of what is going on?
way/114956069
See also note/3807532

116518650 over 2 years ago

Thank you for adding the house numbers here, but note that it's best to use the address fields for house numbers, rather than the name field.
I'm fixing the houses here, but I'm not sure what to do with the sheds and garages (they don't really have an address or a name, but I see that we want to show how they are linked to the house.

138845572 over 2 years ago

Thanks for fixing this, sorry for changing it by mistake.

There is a comment when on a task on MapRoulette about the names, seemingly I didn't check this one carefully enough though.

What I will do is adjust the creation of the tasks so that if the name from the DfE matches 'official_name' but not 'name' then it won't suggest to change the name.