citrula's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 157146605 | about 1 year ago | Google maps and google streetview are not acceptable sources for OSM - there are a couple of street level imagery sources available in iD which you can use instead.
|
| 157135437 | about 1 year ago | foot=no means that nobody is allowed to walk on the road. If the road is simply gated/not open to the public, it should be access=private instead.
|
| 157247299 | about 1 year ago | Hi MH2110, did you mean to add a triangular building in this edit? I can't confirm this on any of the imagery sources available.
|
| 156993810 | about 1 year ago | No worries. Welcome to OSM! For clarity, there is no concept of "private changes" on OSM, we are all working on one big map. There are other tools like uMap ( https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/ ) where you can record private data on top of OSM. |
| 156798715 | about 1 year ago | Sidewalks should be tagged as highway=footway + footway=sidewalk, not highway=pedestrian. More on the wiki: osm.wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_separate_way
|
| 156885893 | about 1 year ago | Hi scottiejibz, grassland on OSM normally doesn't apply to mowed/managed grass like this - it's probably better to use landuse=grass instead. Also, unless people refer to this as "Pioneer Hill Dog Park #2", it probably doesn't belong in the name tag. Take a look at the wiki: osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
|
| 156993810 | about 1 year ago | Hello, I have reverted this changeset because it looks like you might have accidentally added a bunch of ways with no tags - if you leave a comment describing what you are trying to do, I can help point you in the right direction. |
| 156883715 | about 1 year ago | Hi clarissa, this opening_hours tag is not correct. Please take another look, maybe something got mixed up pasting it in?
|
| 156955817 | about 1 year ago | Hi, are these building numbers? What is the name "11310" meant to be on the sidewalk?
|
| 156326235 | over 1 year ago | When you add addresses in SC, please make sure to use the designated fields for each part of the address - they are stored in separate tags on OSM
|
| 156286981 | over 1 year ago | Welcome to OSM - Please don't use descriptive names like "Brazoswood Apts Driveway Entry/Exit". It's totally fine for objects to not have a name. Please take a look at the wiki: osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
|
| 156275845 | over 1 year ago | mtopi, your new parking lot almost completely overlaps an existing one - can you explain what you are trying to do with this edit?
|
| 156282867 | over 1 year ago | Welcome to OSM. I have removed your edit because you drew a giant building crossing the road - let me know if you have any questions. |
| 155882123 | over 1 year ago | I read some community discussions and I realized that dropping the `name` tag on sections of roads like this with no "local name" isn't actually as common as I thought it was - sorry for the confusion. |
| 155933620 | over 1 year ago | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. If you use the "Esri World" imagery layer, it looks like the path is visible on imagery so you can trace it more accurately.
|
| 155963707 | over 1 year ago | asphalteric, could you explain in more detail why you think this isn't a pedestrian plaza? |
| 155882123 | over 1 year ago | FM 685 is a route number, not a name. Leaving it unnamed is fine if there's not a local name for that portion, like Dessau Road to the south. |
| 155755025 | over 1 year ago | Reverted |
| 155701425 | over 1 year ago | Welcome to OSM! building=* ways should be drawn to the edge of the building itself, not the property line
|
| 155637985 | over 1 year ago | Please don't use the description field to advertise your store - I have removed the description.
|