Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. This looks good to me, but is the street name "Lago Vista" (no suffix) or "Lago Vista Boulevard"?

you added `not:operator:wikidata=Q8039932` to the building - this is probably because you rejected the suggested name and added the expanded version

I reverted these edits because you are adding ways with no tags on top of existing roadways. I encourage you to do the built-in editor tutorial, and take a look at the wiki ( osm.wiki/ )

If you explain what you are trying to add, I'd be happy to point you in the right direction.

changeset/167721769

Building numbers are probably more suited for ref= than osm.wiki/Tag:name=. What do you think?

ref=*

Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. It looks like maybe the dog park might be a bit to the east, since the area you added has a couple of playgrounds and sports pitches. What do you think?

Does this business have a storefront or office? It looks like the address might just be for a PO box?

Welcome to OSM. You added this as a zoo - not sure if you realize, but these edits are visible to everyone. I have retagged it for you.

Welcome to OSM. I am reverting this edit because you dragged a sidewalk across the map, and appear to have added your business in a location that differs from your own website. Please do the built-in editor tutorial and take a look at the wiki ( osm.wiki/ ) before editing again.

changeset/167674306

I split the road and marked the latter part as dirt. Happy mapping!

I have reverted this edit. Please do not "test" things on the production map. If you have a question about how something works, I recommend the wiki as well as the help section on the forum:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/help-and-support/7/none

changeset/167588749

welcome to OSm, and thanks for your contribution. You added a road on top of an existing road. I fixed this for you and put the name on the existing road. Happy mapping!

Welcome to OSM. Please don't map abandoned railways where there is no trace whatsoever (like where it is going through parking lots, buildings, etc and has been completely removed. If you are interested in mapping continuous historical routes like this, I recommend checking out OHM:
https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/

a recent development that you might be interested in is the vector version of OpenRailwayMap, which supports current rail from OSM and historical rail from OHM.
https://github.com/hiddewie/OpenRailwayMap-vector

welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. To add tags to only part of a way, you need to split it first - you can do this by creating a node on the way where you want to split at, and then right click the node and select "split". I went ahead and did that for you. Happy mapping!

please don't use descriptive names like "Season weather filled pond" - you could add `seasonal=yes`
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167330613

In these edits you added a new way on top of the existing one - this doesn't actually mark the trail as closed, you need to modify the parts of the existing way instead.

If you need help doing this, let me know!

reverted. You added incorrect addr:housenumber values to various objects. Please do the built-in editor tutorial and try again

changeset/167153106

Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. Please don't add descriptive names like "private property" or "(private)" - using access tags like you did is sufficient. I have fixed this for you, happy mapping!

You randomly dragged a bunch of nodes around in this edit. reverted

changeset/166998241

Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. On OSM, we try to make only one object for each feature ( osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element )

I cleaned this up a bit to try to clarify where the actual venue is. In a day or so, you can use the routing tool on this website to test and make sure it routes people as expected.

Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions. you also removed the brand and shop=supermarket tags from the Kroger next door - was that intentional?