citrula's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 157941773 | about 1 year ago | If there's a specific issue you're having with software routing pedestrian traffic onto that road (as opposed to the BCRT), maybe there are some connectivity issues with the BCRT that we can resolve. Happy to help look at this if there is a specific problem you are trying to solve |
| 157941773 | about 1 year ago | If there's a sidewalk present there are tags to indicate that. Notably, in Texas, walking on the shoulder of a road is legal when there is not a sidewalk, with the exception of controlled-access highways and roads which have signage indicating otherwise. |
| 159300834 | about 1 year ago | Please use the expanded form of the suffix ("Lane instead of Ln"). I have fixed this for you
|
| 159345438 | about 1 year ago | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions. It looks like you made the entire lot into a building - unless something big has changed recently, that probably isn't correct. :) Let me know if you would like some guidance in fixing this. |
| 159401523 | about 1 year ago | Hello juanrodriguez0987, how can you determine the value of hgv tag from satellite imagery? Is there another source you are using? |
| 159425164 | about 1 year ago | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. I have reviewed your change and it looks good to me! |
| 159337788 | about 1 year ago | Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your contribution. |
| 159178769 | about 1 year ago | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contribution. This looks more like highway=service + service=driveway than a footway. What do you think?
|
| 159147011 | about 1 year ago | This was already mapped: way/744777642
|
| 158683045 | about 1 year ago | Is the deleted track going north of Lakeline gone now? Last time I was over that way I could still see it.
|
| 158907057 | about 1 year ago | This edit adds an unmarked crossing where a highway=cycleway intersects with highway=track. I don't think that this is correct.
|
| 159035653 | about 1 year ago | access=private should only be used for roads where access is restricted in some way. This probably isn't the case for a school service road.
|
| 158497832 | about 1 year ago | Is the road actually named "Lenmar at Schriber Ranch"? That sounds more like a neighborhood name than a street name. Also, the way you created doubles over the existing road - let me know if you need help fixing that. |
| 158433363 | about 1 year ago | When mapping buildings, please only map the building itself. Don't include the parking lot, front lawn, etc. Happy mapping!
|
| 158317376 | about 1 year ago | reverted
|
| 158483305 | about 1 year ago | There's still some leftover stuff from changeset/158317495 which looks dubious. |
| 158370446 | about 1 year ago | What's the source of the name you added for way/580261820 ? |
| 158386987 | about 1 year ago | Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions. service=parking_aisle should be added only when the sole purpose of the way is to access parking - it doesn't look like that's the case here. It's totally fine to leave it as highway=service only.
|
| 158463312 | about 1 year ago | welcome to OSM! Edits you make with maps.me are visible to everyone - they are not personal notes.
|
| 158296924 | about 1 year ago | This is an organized editing account for a group that has been blocked before - osm.org/user_blocks/16608 There are several other accounts as well. |