Welcome to OSM! access=no should only be used for when nobody at all can use the feature, either for safety reasons or some sort of physical constraint. In this case it should be access=private. Happy to explain more if needed. Happy mapping!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144325601

Hi Nerdigans, welcome to OSM! It looks like you are duplicating the POIs that already exist in your changesets - sometimes the stores are tagged on the building area instead of a single point. Either is acceptable in most cases, but we can't have both! Please let me know if you need assistance in correcting this or have any other questions. Happy mapping!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144262383

Hi Joe, it looks like you accidentally added the ford tag to this entire way: way/15404489

The ford tag should go only on the node where the road way and the water way intersect. Let me know if you have any questions :)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144254118

Welcome to OSM! These edits look good to me.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144251555

You can press "Q" to square the corners of buildings using iD.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144216735

Thank you for going out and surveying. I don't think that the DWG ticket/reference is publicly visible, so I will write the part that I know. I escalated to DWG after they had made numerous edits without responding or acknowledging my comment or those left by other people, and deleting the trail.

I was confused about the distinction as well until recently. The wiki really could use some better pictures of both, or maybe a diagram or something.

Welcome to OSM!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144151606

Welcome to OSM! These look good to me.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144151535

Are these kerbs all actually flush? My understanding is that flush kerbs are completely flush with the road with no lip at all.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144141274

Welcome to OSM!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144144084

Hi, were these border wall edits part of a class or a mapathon or something?

Yes, you are right about it only being visible on aerial in the north part due to tree cover. However, using 3DEP layer you can pretty clearly see that the trail continues.
https://imgur.com/a/ZCg82R6

For clarity, I have no problem with the trail having restrictive access tags as the landowner requested, I'm just not sure that adding lifecycle prefix to existing trails is the right solution here.

If you look at MassGIS 2021 imagery and 3DEP there is definitely a trail there. I don't think it's a good idea to use abandoned tag in this way when the trail is definitely still present. access=no or access=private on the trail should be sufficient. Almost all trails-oriented data consumers respect this thanks to work the trails working group has done over the past few years.

Is the trail actually abandoned?

The description tag is not meant to be used as a place to advertise your business. Also, "Additional Phone numbers" is not a valid tag.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144082735

You can press "Q" in iD to square the corners of the buildings you are mapping. The building area should represent the footprint of the building rather than just the roof shape from aerial imagery.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144073333

Welcome to OSM! I have corrected some of the tags on your business to conform with OSM standards. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143163217

Welcome to OSM! I have corrected some of the tags on your business to conform with OSM standards. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143164377

Welcome to OSM! I have corrected some of the tags on your business to conform with OSM standards. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/143204839