One huge question I have about time used in tracing Nazca lines and its shapes, is the lack of certain geometries, one would expect. Very often, long distances of perfectly straight lines, with long acute angles are common, as with lots of evidence where two lines starting rather close to each other might meet many meters away to a single point.

What seems rare is having multiple lines being the same exact length, and perfect right angles. Angles that are 90 degrees or that angles of 30 or 45 degrees, perfect circles, semi circles and/or use of tangents are never seen or given much importance. The uses of golden sections, and those proportions, never seem to be given much importance. Curves and tangents from other shapes and curves are occasionally shown, plus those that relate to a specific shape or object might be well represented. significant geometric importance. One also would expect to see more use of Pi, but without true perfect squares, rectangles or circles, any calculation using Pi is also not given any special importance. There also doesn’t seem to be much whole number equally divided segmented distances. While occasionally a line might bisect, its for more organic than just that therefore not based on any grid pattern.

Lines don’t seem consistently to point or emanate from anywhere. Whether vantage point, low lines, valley or peaks, its not apparent as a straight line or perpendicular to anyone justified. Lines might merge, and multiple lines might merge, but there is no real pattern or expectation. Lines don’t seem to frame anything, whether other lines or shapes, There are cases where a line might frame a shape, but there is little rules to obtain a pattern. This is also true with line thicknesses, that tend to lack consistency in how they are drawn, but then there are examples they might have a certain consistency throughout the entire line shape. Merge points don’t seem to land anywhere significant every time. When a line crosses another line there is little consistency with this. .

There also seems to be little relationships between the figurative shapes and the Nazca lines, even though a collection of Nazca lines in near presence to figurative shapes is usual, the size of Nazca lines grouped in areas have little relationships to sizes, shapes, content, or number of figurative shapes. Occasionally a Nazca light might point to a shape t 16. Rarely you will find figurative shapes without nearby Nazca lines or being pointed to Nazca lines.

One other notable issue, is the aspect of crooked, shifted lines. Some crooked and or shifted lines are common. Maybe it was geologic feature that made it impossible to run a straight like or washed away or connected a different line This aspect is not making it easy to determine its reason or need.

In review, time may have erased some or all of the above findings due to massive storms by El Nino floodplains. Unlink the geometric shapes found in Ancient Egypt, Greece or Rome, even Mayan, the Incas do not seem to use hidden code in the same way.

I will continue to see if I can run across any, but it is astounding that unlike other world level monolithic sites, it seems this place is completely random, with anything coded having any importance here. It seems to me the people here were trying to appease Gods that failed to answer them. So they speaking to them, believing what they are doing has improved their existence.