buy_osmand's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 171753345 | 4 months ago | test comment. 👋😆
|
| 171432015 | 4 months ago | ٱلسَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ,
I, buy_osmand, Living man walking on the island known in the Book of Nations as, the `Republik of Singapura` hereby affirms the great value of the ground_survey `check_dates` by good mapper, [[ Nysh! ]]. Your good works current & future, without monetary compensation is highly recognized. AlhamdullilahirRabil'aalaameen❗❕
|
| 171427451 | 4 months ago | ٱلسَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ,
Greetings from me to you, your good intentions have led you here 😊. You have requested for review and here is my brief take of it. relation/9569901 is common to be recommended for Tourism.. it has touchups on it's sides but it's mostly a natural formation, please do take this local opinion of mine with grace and make the appropriate reverts as deemed necessary 😉 AlhamdullilahirRabil'aalaameen❗❕
|
| 171429636 | 4 months ago | To good mapper Tristan Partin,
This edit so GOOD 😳👍
|
| 171195448 | 4 months ago | Thank you for your highly valuable ground survey upload❗❕ This changeset has been marked as good 😳👍 Peace❕❕
|
| 170874975 | 4 months ago | ٱلسَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ,
Imagery from corporate company `Grab Holdings sg` is dated **2019, 6 years ago**... are you certain it's still there GrabSG_AndyAng ❓ https://kartaview.org/details/1382566/1572/track-info
|
| 171233115 | 4 months ago | bismillahirRahmaanirRaheem,
How can we solve this peacefully❓I still want osm map to not be confusing ‼ in clearer words, i stand with the edits By B972025 (changeset author) ‼
|
| 171221344 | 4 months ago | ٱلسَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ,
in addition, i would like to support this edit with the review of the previous mapper's action changeset/154634809, where the changeset tags are interpreted to be insufficient to be accepted as valid orthophoto tracing. Hence ,"mass deletion" flag raised of this changeset/171221344 has effectively been put to rest. AlhamdullilahirRabil'aalaameen❗❕
|
| 171116171 | 4 months ago | I'm stating facts, in your changeset tag `imagery` the value does not match to what you have declared in your comment. Please do correction where necessary in your future compensated works. Have a good day‼
|
| 170813030 | 4 months ago | I have additionally called branch phone number
Your good works current & future, without monetary compensation is highly recognized.
|
| 171005056 | 4 months ago | 🎉I'm not . . .this good !! for my first edit 😄 😳👍 Good, #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
|
| 171017932 | 4 months ago | I, buy_osmand, Living man walking on the island known in the Book of Nations as, the Republik of Singapura hereby affirms the great value of the ground_survey `check_dates` by good mapper, YJJcoolcool. Your good works current & future, without monetary compensation is highly recognized. ٱلسَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ,
|
| 171003925 | 4 months ago | You are not to be held responsible but i am allowed to make this factual statement. I have reviewed and observed that these two stretch of roads are split into many pieces. If any mapper is up for it, and there isn't an issue with merging them then please proceed. April 10th, Mankind is free 🚶♀️🚶♂️ << this is a message sign off of truth
|
| 170975417 | 4 months ago | Prime example that no ai with all its computational powers combined is able to perform as of today, afaik 😏. Let this be known.
|
| 170965885 | 4 months ago | |
| 170965885 | 4 months ago | Based on this reviewed changeset, I, presume that corporate Grab applications are not providing the following software support as citation: restriction=no%20u%20turn?uselang=en#:~:text=Even%20if%20a%20U%2Dturn%20restriction%20relation%20is%20missing%2C%20a%20typical%20routing%20engine%20tries%20to%20avoid%20sending%20the%20user%20on%20a%20U%2Dturn%2C Thereby, requiring their paid corporate persons to thoroughly apply `restriction=no_u_turn` relations on >> every road intersection <<. Please do feel free to correct my statement. ٱلسَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ,
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170593529 |
| 166185447 | 5 months ago | I, buy_osmand hereby affirms the great value of the ground_survey `check_dates` by good mapper, Skycaptnkragg. Your good works current & future, without monetary compensation is highly recognized. I, buy_osmand, Living man of the island known in the Book of Nations as, the Republik of Singapura ٱلسَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ,
|
| 170903461 | 5 months ago | I, buy_osmand, Living man of the island known in the Book of Nations as, the Republik of Singapura, do hereby reaffirm his intentions written at a date timestamped prior as quoted verbatim, " 👀 This changeset is being watched by the #Living. The reasoning is accepted, it is acknowledged as based on ground experience. 👍 Disclaimer: I am not a resident of this area, but if called upon to break disputes, I will answer that call and weigh in as unbiased as I strive to be for the good of all. This writing is also not a notice to any parties, current & future for enforcement." By my Living Hands,
ٱلسَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ,
|
| 170753588 | 5 months ago | Following the comment from 25or6to4, I, buy_osmand, hereby fulfills the initial intention. Thank you Milroy1812, good mapper of the state of Texas, for your current and future works. 😳👍 Good,
|
| 170753588 | 5 months ago | I, buy_osmand, have intentions to mark this edit as Good, but specifically invites 25or6to4, an active mapper of the state of Texas to provide his comments firstly. 25or6to4 , good mapper, is this all to the tee 😳⁉ Disclaimer: I am a mapper not of the land as the both you gentlemen, please explicitly instruct me to mind my own business if found to have offended the locals of Texas.
|