I think that it’s a very good idea to use issue-tracking for this purpose.

And I don’t think that it is necessarily a bad think if a discussion will be tracked in such a system AND parallel to it discussed in the mailing list - as you can post a link to a mail-list archive to an issue-tracker (“for the record”) and vice versa.

It’s disturbing that in 2015 anyone uses anything other than SI… :-(

Hi!

I’m not sure this is such a good idea. I leave sometimes such points as a preparation for future mapping.

Maybe you can add a condition that the point to be deleted is older than (at least) two weeks?

„Džibutsko“ zní dost hrozně.

It is anyway rather problematic in many cases how it is mapped.

In general, in many places it is simply not mapped. I am not aware about incorrect and hard to fix misuse of landuse=residential that is so widespread that stopping rendering it would be a good idea.

In many places it is just not clear what should be mapped as landuse=residential because it is not obvious on the ground. Therefore I don’t see much sense in displaying it - at least at such zoomlevels.

On the other hand the residential streets clearly exist on the ground an therefore should be rendered even at z12!

Hi!

I would definitely render higway=residential @ z12. On the other hand one could consider not rendering area=residential at this zoom-level at all. It is anyway rather problematic in many cases how it is mapped.

Sorry to say but your colours seem really horrible. The original is much much better.

What a pity you don’t offer a possibility to edit the data in JOSM!

BTW, will you cover Europe soon as well?

Ich staune darüber, ob die noexit tags wirklich notwendig sind. Ich finde es ein wenig dumm etwas zu taggen, was es nicht gibt, bzw. was sich von selbst erschließt.

Wouldn’t landuse=minefield be a more consistent way than hazard=minefield?

spam, spam, spam, spam, bacon and spam… :-)

Haben eigentlich auch kleinere Ausfahrten (wie Raststätten oder sogar kleine Parkplätze) refs und Namen?

Well, actually, I like Openstreetmaps. If you look at some comercial maps, the roads look unrealistic thick - in reality they would be a couple of hunderts meter thick. So I think that openstreetmap is much superior to those unrealistic maps.

Schlimm, schlimm, schlimm, dass DIN gegen die typographischen Gewohnheiten verstößt.

Nice!

A pitty that you cannot zoom to a particular area, though…

Hi! Very interesting!

Just a question: Do you plan to share at least some data with the main OpenStreetMap database?

Cool, dass es so etwas wie Overpass gibt. Habe versucht in meiner Gegend die evangelischen Kirchen richtig zu taggen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24230584

Hi!

I created my account on Sep 5th 2007 and my first edit occured in Jun 2012. Since then contributed 187 edits.

I strongly disagree with your proposal ;-)

You need to check the “small components” checkbox (where you choose the map) to see the purple overlays.

Es fehlen anscheinend noch paar Häuser: osm.org/?lat=52.44419&lon=9.733969&zoom=18&layers=M …