OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Thought it worth posting this.

After much frustration I have come up with what I do regarding amenity=parking and highway=rest_area (plus details) and have been running this way for 6-12 months. This is live data input (my eyeball/camera/recording etc) as I drive through. I think there have been maybe 1200-1400 objects so far!

I have generally adopted a formal vs informal data set. Formal is almost based wholly on site signs and informal on a mix of triggers and interpretations.

This generally only applies to regional places, not so such towns and high population areas.

There are always contentions! I have come across many (other mapper) highway=rest_area objects that are not “my formal”, as I make no allowance for locations that “could be”. Indeed any parking area could be an informal rest area, so are informal ones needed at all? In the end I sometimes use informal=yes or informal=no to clarify.

So looking at the SA and WA govt databases and my limited travels, SA calls everything “rest areas” and their naming system starts “RA”. This is also seen on roads where virtually every stop has a rest area sign at 1km before, followed by a “P” or two. WA calls everything “stopping places” with a plain number designation. It’s almost as if “P” locations in WA are not allowed to be rest areas! There is also a distinct lack of HGV defined “P” in WA where I wonder if trucks actually get stuck in small ones! Of course Qld is quite unfriendly in defining large areas with useful facilities as HGV only, but that’s another story!

The “informals” are basically NHVR Green Dot, Stockpiles/gravel pits and any place that looks like a truck has been parking for a few years! I also map gravel pits that “could be” used for parking.

So onto the process.

MAIN DECISIONS

Rest area objects are most often nodes only with just the name. No other tags. (except a possible informal as mentioned above) Parking objects contain maximum tag details. A rest/parking area that has multiple signs only usually has two objects, the parking one containing both access=yes and hgv=designated etc A rest area sign implies parking exists within it, but a parking sign does not imply a rest area exist

  • Any informal site hgv=yes if that is the current usage or will fit hgv=no if the entry/exit is too tight Then above are also in precedence order. Example - some formal parking areas were formerly NHVR green dot type, so the formal tagging is used with description including prior NHVR status. (unless the green dots are removed…)

INFORMAL vs not tag

Other objects at parking areas

  • Picnic shelter and if provided bin and lighting
  • Picnic tables
  • RV dump points
  • Toilets with normal iD full details including lit=yes if so. I also enter the rest area etc as name if known.
  • When creating parking objects directly on both sides of a road offset them slightly so the left side “comes first” (for navigator routing engines)
Email icon Bluesky Icon Facebook Icon LinkedIn Icon Mastodon Icon Telegram Icon X Icon

Discussion

Comment from Marcos Dione on 5 January 2023 at 12:57

Would you tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=rest_area also those highway stops that are bigger than just toilets + picnic tables? For instance these guys:

osm.org/#map=17/43.41499/6.45305

Comment from bob3bob3 on 5 January 2023 at 14:20

Hi Marcos

I only tag highway=rest_area if a formal rest area sign exist. (commonly a tree and picnic table graphic) In any case I create toilets and picnic tables as separate objects.

And I distinguish between formal or not, amenity=parking also based on a sign (commonly a white/blue “P”)

Please be aware that most of my work is on remote Australian roads where many stopping places are not formal and often not paved.

Cheers

Log in to leave a comment