OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
172074707 3 months ago

Ah. I think the lot number should be addressed with the addr:unit tag.

changeset/172074707

172074707 3 months ago

Would it be correct to describe this address as 41 Pembleton Place, Waverly NY?

168530688 4 months ago

FYI, this changeset with church which has been gone for years.
note/4956347

171514967 4 months ago

Christophermendoza510:
I've just reverted the renaming of San Lorenzo Creek to "hayward ca" after seeing it flagged as a mistake.
note/4949922

I see you are brand new to OSM. Can I help you with what you were intending to edit?

171585971 4 months ago

Wrong source comment. Local knowledge and website as tagged.

171107656 4 months ago

Nice work! I'd not expected to find an internet source specifically documenting a "roundabout... known as" and appreciate you looking out for your home state.

170135865 5 months ago

Oh. I see you did this with CoMaps which probably forces you to pick one and only one of these tags. Anyway, fixed now.

170135865 5 months ago

Good job with your first edit.

I've added amenity=cafe since this place seems to sell prepared drinks not captured by the shop=coffee tag alone.

shop=coffee

167701007 6 months ago

While I see eastbound was quickly corrected as the road had already been opened before this changeset, the westbound lane was accidentally left close for over two weeks
way/1395759020

Changing the permanent access controls on an OSM element to reflect short term road closure, even if anticipated to be a week is a poor idea. Many downstream uses take snapshots of the OSM data and use it for months.

167956676 6 months ago

Thanks as well for your good work. This import and the after consideration to the edge cases have been very well handled.

167956676 6 months ago

It's now fixed, but here is an example of where this edit has duplicated an element already on the map.

note/4827069

160006974 7 months ago

OK. If the land users and managers have names for the trails, I appreciate your efforts to get that information. I myself got into this project to map a local forest in my town. For future edits, I'd recommend a more specific source comment such as "discussions with land users and managers" to make this clear.

160006974 7 months ago

You've cited "knowledge" for many edits in this area. Can you elaborate on how your knowledge of trail names was acquired? Are they signposted? Has someone published a trail guide or map?

For these names to be is scope for OSM, they need to be verifiable.
osm.wiki/Verifiability

166543323 7 months ago

added

changeset/166543323

165821820 8 months ago

... and add website to Aldi. Sorry for long geographic area--it was a mistake.

165807290 8 months ago

Source: ... and ESRI imagery

165736043 8 months ago

Hi TucsonIsFor[]ers:
Can you confirm having seen this in person?

While I appreciate your interest in citing an internet source we can all see, that one is not one we use for intellectual property reasons. If you've seen it, you're the source--problem solved.

164610099 9 months ago

Welcome to OSM o0elMira0o.

I'm glad to see someone citing local knowledge fill in the track. I was not comfortable doing it from imagery alone having not seen it.

I've changed the tagging from narrow_gauge to miniature and marked the track gauge=184 (mm) based internet sources saying its 1/8 scale. Do correct that if you have more precise information, as it appears 190 is also an option, such as here.

way/613631580

110542862 10 months ago

Yes, I see what you are talking about now and doubt doubt there may have been very small bridge that escapes my memory. Thanks for checking!

110542862 10 months ago

Greg Rose:
Have you seen this bridge?

way/978314272
I hiked this about 11 months before you marked it. The fords are real. If there's a bridge here, I've forgotten it.
It seems odd to have a bridge over a small creek that can only be accessed by four fords of a bigger creek.

Unfortunately, my one photo is of the cabin taken with the creek to my back.