Hey! Thanks for contributing to OSM. One note about your first changeset: The "Name" field is meant to be used for the actual name of something, like a business name or street name. Descriptive text such as "Storage Shed" belongs in a different field. Unless, of course, this building really is named "Storage Shed!"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85052112

Thanks for contributing to OSM! Your changes look good.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84913793

Hi! Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing! Just one small note on your first changeset: You added a couple of small interior roads to this park and tagged them as "unclassified." The terminology in OSM is a little unclear, but these are probably better tagged as "service" roads.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84376665

Hi! Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing. I have one note on your edits: Since most roads are not one-way, it's not necessary to explicitly tag them as such. It doesn't do any harm, but it's also an extra step that isn't really needed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84367772

Is there really an ATM in someone's house? That seems unlikely...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84289821

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84285563

Hi! Welcome to Openstreetmap, and thanks for contributing! A quick piece of feedback for you: Make sure that you don't map the same object twice. For example, you have two different sidewalks crossing over Carlton here, when there should only be one: osm.org/edit?editor=id&way=791895850#map=19/42.99187/-85.63554
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83551093

Your edits look good! Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for contributing.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83162958

Thanks, this edit looks good! I'd definitely rather ride a "bike path" than a "bile path."
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82846750

Sure! I'll send you a message through OSM. That'll be more convenient than discussing it here in the changeset comments.

Hey, I noticed these edits you made, and I'm curious about some parts of them. You added a section of trail running along Greenwood Rd, Cedar Valley Rd, and Shanley Rd, marked "paved." Does the NCT exist separately from the road here, or do travelers walk on the shoulder? If it's the shoulder, then adding a separate way for the trail like you've done isn't really appropriate.

If there is a separate path for the trail, then those parts of the trail should be added to the NCT relation. Are you familiar with relations in OpenStreetMap?

Nice work, thanks! If my sidewalk feedback was a little fuzzy, here's an example of some well-mapped sidewalks you could look at for guidance: osm.org/edit#map=19/42.68926/-84.28298

Welcome to OSM! Your changes look good. Thanks for contributing! If you're looking for something else to add, it looks like the boundaries of the school grounds could use some improvement, and there are features like playground areas, footpaths, parking, and a driveway that could be added.

Thanks again!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82319999

Hi! Thanks for contributing to OSM! Since you requested feedback, I thought I'd pass along a few areas for improvement:

When a sidewalk intersects a road (like it does with Wescott Court) the two ways should be joined with a single node. You've tagged the sidewalk as being in a tunnel under the road, which, while not impossible, seems unlikely!

Also, you tagged a parking lot near the park as "parking aisle." That set of tags is for roads that go through a parking lot. The parking lot itself should be traced as an area and then tagged as a parking lot.

Please reach out if you have any questions!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82280856

Hey, thanks for adding this info. OpenStreetMap has tagging standards that need to be followed in order for the information to be understandable. For example "Tel No" is not a standard tag. I cleaned up your listing so that it matches standard OSM tags.

Thanks for grabbing a GPS trace of the trail and making it more accurate! Looks great.

Hey, I'm glad you chose to contribute to the map, but one of the principals of OpenStreetMap is that we only map things that are visible on the ground. Property lines aren't one of those things, and mapping them with a foot path definitely isn't a best practice.

I removed the path from the map, and wanted to let you know why.

Hey, thanks for adding this POI, but in the process you deleted some nodes that made bad changes to the shape of the building. Be a little more careful next time, OK?

Thanks for adding this street! I changed the road type slightly, but we really appreciate your contribution.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71713325

Hi! Thanks for added detail in the area. Nice work!

Just a small piece of feedback for you. When a stream crosses a road, you probably don't want to tag that as a ford. A ford is for where the stream is running across the road (ford=*?uselang=en-US), whereas these are probably all culverts, in which case you would split out the section of the stream that passes through the culvert and tag it with tunnel=culvert.