bbmiller's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 33705563 | over 10 years ago | Sadly, this changeset is already out of date! |
| 17447525 | over 10 years ago | This changeset seems to have created a lot of points that don't have any tags and don't belong to any ways. See the area of Darrouzett for some examples. |
| 33224964 | over 10 years ago | FYI railway=level_crossing (like for this node: node/133967472) is used where a railway crosses a highway, not for one railway crossing another. |
| 33259018 | over 10 years ago | In the satellite view there doesn't appear to be a railroad crossing at this intersection. |
| 27252374 | over 10 years ago | P.S. I removed the station from the relations, so they should be correct now. |
| 27252374 | over 10 years ago | Hi! I was just taking a quick spin through the L relations to check them over, and noticed that the Roosevelt/State station node had been added to the Red Line relations. That's actually not correct: the stop_position nodes should be in the relations, but not the stations themselves. A little confusing, I know. You can find more information in the OSM wiki: osm.wiki/Proposed_features/Public_Transport#Route_direction.2Fvariant |
| 32633734 | over 10 years ago | Yeah, that's probably my fault. I moved a couple of them around. I fixed a few that seemed like they needed improvement. I'll make another pass and it should be good. |
| 32633734 | over 10 years ago | Hey, I just noticed some of these edits. FYI, it's not a great idea to align a building area with the roof of the building. Unless the imagery is straight on, the roof is offset from the actual footprint of the building. It's hard sometimes to determine sometimes where the footprint is, but that's what you should be trying to map. Sometimes it's easiest to map the roof, and then move the outline to line up with the building footprint. There's some dated but helpful information here: osm.wiki/Roof_modelling |
| 25658224 | almost 11 years ago | Cool. That seems fine to me. |
| 29456997 | almost 11 years ago | * The note was #293852 |
| 25658224 | almost 11 years ago | Hey, is there a reason why you classified these roads as tertiary? Most of them dirt roads, on a relatively un-populated island, and it doesn't seem justified that they would be above highway=residential. |
| 27342597 | about 11 years ago | Yeah, I don't know Thoreson at all, but if you do, go to town! I updated some parts of Basch today (prompted by your edits) based on some personal experience. |
| 27342597 | about 11 years ago | Good question. I'm sure it's partly a judgment call, but I think of a track as something that I probably wouldn't want to drive the average car on. A smooth unpaved road is something different. The wiki has some guidance: |
| 27342597 | about 11 years ago | Hey! Nice work on adding those footpaths. One thought: Thoreson Road looks (to me) like only the southern end of it qualifies as a track. The best thing to do is probably to split the way at the appropriate point and tag the northern half as Unclassified, with an unpaved surface. |