OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
64752223 about 7 years ago

It looks like a river should look to me. What feature isn't loading for you? Maybe you could take a screenshot and make it available somewhere.

64630456 about 7 years ago

Sorry about that. I missed cleaning up tags on the newly created inner polygons of the multipolygon. I've corrected that now. Does it look better? If not, please give me some details on what you believe is wrong with it.

64630456 about 7 years ago

Thanks @bp0410. I'll take a look.

49818765 about 7 years ago

Hi there @AKLAB. Thanks for all of your contributions. The area looks great. But you might want to know about a couple of problems with your landuse areas that you are creating. The first problem is that a way is not supposed to cross back onto itself. So when you are drawing a landuse area using a street like a cul de sac, you are going up the street and then using the same nodes going back down the street. This causes validation problems. Another problem is that you aren't supposed to connect an area to a way. The best way I've seen to create landuse=residential is to trace the sidewalks and not the center-line road way.

64579776 about 7 years ago

Two single-node ways and 8 nodes without tags that were all in the same location were removed in changeset/64587379

63846204 about 7 years ago

Hi @kbzimmer. Thanks for adding all of these new OSM features. One thing you should know is that outlines of buildings (ways) shouldn't cross over themselves. For example, way/635768307 kind of does a figure eight around some buildings that possibly meet at their corners. The outline should go around the entire outside of the building and not cross itself. You can see the difference in my change.
Also, I think that DigitalGlobe has newer imagery than Bing and a couple of these buildings no longer exist. You might want to switch to using the later satellite imagery.

64536299 about 7 years ago

Hello @meyer407. These nodes are all empty and part of a relationship that also includes a single-node way. I'm pretty sure this is in error and I've deleted the nodes, relationship and the way. If this was part of an ongoing project, let me know and I can revert my clean-up effort.

Go Bulldogs!

64381941 about 7 years ago

@jwbrett, it looks like you moved a node 1700ft and skewed a bunch of connected roads. Any chance you can go back and repair/revert it? The node is node/197740540

38302260 about 7 years ago

Hi @jpmartin1977. I don't know much about bus routes and how to map them, but I checked with others and they agreed that the EZRider relation isn't mapped correctly. If I'm not mistaken, you aren't suppose to draw an additional way, but instead add existing road ways into a relation. Sorry I can't be more help explaining the right way.

58515501 about 7 years ago

Why are there 8+ streams all in the same path?

64426945 about 7 years ago

Hello @Crete Greece.

You might want to be aware that convention states that you shouldn't put a description of a feature in the "name" of the OSM element. See osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only for details.

Thanks for the contributions.

64421457 about 7 years ago

Welcome to OpenStreetMap Dick. Nice to have more people in Oregon doing mapping. I've made a couple of changes to your additions to follow OSM guidelines a little more. (If you don't agree with my changes, let me know or go ahead and revert them.)

The first thing I changed was getting rid of the abbreviations like "NE" and "St". You can read more here: osm.wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29

Then I converted the name_1 and name_2 keys to a semi-colon separated alt_name key as name_# keys are deprecated: osm.wiki/Proposed_features/Remove_suffixed_name-tags_from_wiki

I also tried to match up the names and alt_names with the connecting roads, but I'm not sure I did the right thing as I'm not local. The northern road is Lambert and the southern road is Cornelius. Are you local? If so, please tidy these up as you have more local knowledge.

Thanks again for the contributions and hope to see you again.

32810484 about 7 years ago

There is already a defined track road for part of these snowmobile gps-tracks(?). You shouldn't be adding a way where one already exists, should you?

53195540 about 7 years ago

FYI, the Bartlett River Trail you uploaded duplicated nodes (went all the way out and then doubled back along the same nodes). It also duplicated portions of the Lake Trail that you uploaded on the same day.

64308176 about 7 years ago

Hello @braidrass and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contribution is appreciated. I noticed you asked for a review. Most of your addition looks just fine but I wanted to let you know about a feature to "square" the corners of things like buildings by selecting the line and hitting 'Shift-S' or right clicking the line and selecting the Square function. It will make sure all of the corners are 90 degrees, like most buildings are built with.
We hope you come back again.

64156870 about 7 years ago

Hi Franta, I noticed that your trail had man duplicate nodes. I'm curious to know what tools you used to upload the kml file. Maybe we can file some bugs against some tool to make sure it doesn't create the same exact node several times. I've fixed the trail already, so nothing else to do here.

64226941 about 7 years ago

What type of business is this?

63890023 about 7 years ago

Another: way/638755828

63890023 about 7 years ago

BTW, the way in question is way/638134323

63890023 about 7 years ago

If this is an ongoing process, you might want to consider adding a self-intersection check to the ways that are being drawn. I've noticed a couple of examples where the line crossed back over itself, which triggers various validation checks. If you load your change files into JOSM, one of the validation checks that is run before upload is a check for that error.