Levi Lane appears to go through someone's backyard and makes it so they have to cross the street to get to their private swimming pool. Is the imagery that out of date?

Why was way/5343133 deleted exactly? It didn't quite line up with the sat imagery, but it was close enough that it should be left IMO. Some of your deleted ways were clearly bogus and should be deleted, but some seem like they could have been left. As someone that has been lost on logging roads, I'd rather have something slightly off than completely deleted.

@PhenS: alternatively, you could tag the way as "service=driveway", "surface=gravel", "access=private" if you wanted.

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing by tracing so many buildings! On this particular change, there is a spurious area way that snuck in that I'm going to delete. And I'm going to unname the building since it looks like you might have accidentally added your change comments ("created building") to the actual name of the building.

Will do.

This can't possibly be an actual footpath, can it? I don't see any paths in imagery and it zigzags through houses and yards. Should this be deleted? Was it an editing error?

Or maybe this is a lane only for buses and that is why it is access=no. If that is the case, I'm confused about the parking lot being a one-way road with no apparent way to exit without going into the bus lane. I'll hold back on any change until I can survey or hear back from someone.

The following way shouldn't be tagged as "access=no" IMO. Can you confirm please? I'm going to revert it to be open access.

This seems overly complex. What exactly is trying to be accomplished here? Are you drawing paths or trying to create an area that is part of the college. All of the doubling back of paths seems too much. Please enlighten me.

The parking structure labelled as "Apple Mathilda 4" is a shared parking lot between Apple and LinkedIn. Does Apple really give parking structures building numbers? Either way, it should be noted that it is an Apple/LinkedIn parking structure.