Hi @Melase,
Just so you know, I deleted way/646011493 since there was already a way drawn for those roads. If you feel this is a mistake, please let me know.

Hi Brian@Brea. Can you help me out with way/625187729. There is a pretty hard and fast "rule" of OSM that ways can't cross over themselves without an intersection. If this boat ride is on a flat body of water, I'm wondering if a way is the best way to represent the path. If so, I'm guessing the way should be broken up into pieces and "intersections" put into place, right? If it is more of a ride (like a log ride), then the way should be broken up and layer=N tags put into place. I can't tell from imagery what the path actually is. So I'm hoping you can lend a hand.

Thanks,
b-jazz

Hi there. I'm curious to know why you are adding things like swimming pools and why someone else added a stereo store to a US census statistical area relation. Was this an accident? If not, please clear it up for me. Thanks.

Oh man. I'm really sorry about that. My change was trivial and can be reverted if that makes it easier for you to to resolve the conflicts.
I'll make sure I wait several days before editing any of your work in the area again.

Welcome to OpenStreetMaps, Janet. We appreciate your contributions.

Hi there Robert Lamm. Are you aware that the nodes that make up some of these boundaries are stacked on top of each other at least 6+ times? At least for way/652979075, there are many nodes that occupy the same centimeter of space. Is that something you can clean up?

Hi PaulaSJ. Can you explain what you wanted to do here? I'm not sure if you were aware or not, but there is already a segment in place for that road. Did you want to add additional tags to the existing road?

Is this a four hole course? If so, there is a more accepted way of mapping it so that there isn't a single intersecting line. Check out osm.wiki/Disc_golf for suggestions on how to map it. We'd love to see more courses properly mapped so they show up in searches.
Let me know if you need help.

Hey there MapperKB. Just wanted to let you know that I'm going to attempt to clean up "Eastern Woods" in the next few days. The way to describe the woods is overly complex and makes editing difficult and it violates some best practices (ways shouldn't cross, double back, or overlap themselves). You might want to keep an eye on the area and make sure I don't break something that you intended to be there.

Does Mosher Lake actually exist? Looks completely forested in that area from satellite imagery.

Hey there @metalartgate. Looks like you (and maybe others) are uploading multiple tracks for the same path. Can you make sure duplicates aren't being uploaded? In general, there shouldn't be more than one trace for a particular trail.
Thanks.

Removed in changeset/65059994

Excellent. I hadn't thought of that solution.

There is the Simplify Way (Shift+Y) command under Tools that will help, but it isn't perfect, I've had it leave behind a way that crosses itself.
If you are in JOSM, you should be able to select the way, and validate it (Shift-V) and it will bring up the validation panel telling you there is a point in the way that crosses itself.
My Garmin has an auto-stop feature that will stop recording if it detects that I've stopped moving. That might help as well.

Hi @bradrh. Looks like you had a fun Thanksgiving weekend on your bike.

When uploading GPS tracks, you might want to zoom in and edit out any spots where you stopped to admire the view or catch your breath. The GPS will jitter and leave a cluster of poorly aligned points.

It's actually easier than I thought it would be. Try this:
1) draw an area around a forest
2) draw an area around some residential property inside that forest
3) hold down shift and select the outer area. you should now have two areas selected.
4) press "C" to combine the two.
5) click on the border shading inside of the forest area and set it to "Wood"
6) click on the border shading inside of the residential area and set it to "Residential".

Let me know if that doesn't work. And thanks for working with me on this. It will save me a lot of work in the future.

I'm pretty sure that the correct, manual of style way is to use an inner polygon for the non wood types of the outer polygon. If that is too difficult with the given tools, I'd venture to guess that making the whole area a forest and then adding some buildings inside the forest would be acceptable and wouldn't trigger any errors.
Do you need help learning how to create multipolygons, or is there another issue that makes them onerous?

Hi again Bkissin,

I'd love it if you could stop doing the following style of mapping: https://imgur.com/a/oaR0j1m since it gets tagged by validators like OSM Inspector and I end up going in and cleaning it up. If you can't use multipolygons, at least don't use the same nodes going out of the "island" as you do going in. It's them crossing or overlapping that sets off error flags.
Thanks.

I already added it manually, so there is nothing that you need to do now. What @freebeer is trying to do is replace my brand new building by restoring the old one so that there is some history. If he succeeds, great. If not, it isn't the end of the world.

Fantastic. Thanks for getting back to me. And sorry for the temporary problems.