By the way. The water outlet, which you refered to as fountain, isn't this an outlet for watering animal pets? In this case "drinking=no" refers to humans as the outlet is rather near the ground. Or is my recollection wrong?

It is not a question of disagreement, but of you consistently changing correctly tagged ways because you personally favor an other way of tagging. The worst thing is you do not state this explicatly and give reasons for this, but rather you comment this with "fix". This could well be deemed as vandalism or at least lack of respect for other users edits.
But let's wait and see what DWG has to say about this.

Well don't use fountain when it's not a fountain.

I do see this as a vandalism light from your side. This is not the first time you did this. My tagging was totally correct as seen in:

a) highway=path#Usage_as_a_universal_tag

b) osm.wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren

So there is absolutly no reason att all for you changing correct tagged ways only because you prefer an alternative tagging. As you have done this earlyer in grand style otherwhere I will report this to DWG.

This way was tagged by me as a combined foot- and cykelway, according what the wiki states. This was a correct tagging. Why would you change to cycleway with comment "fix"?

Again; why are you tagging this as a fountain (it is not) and why are you tagging this as drinking water no (which it is)? https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domkyrkobrunnen

Tack för ditt svar! Frågan varför du taggade om vägen till en ren cykelväg när du själv hade konstaterat att skylten D6 fanns på plats kommer väl aldrig att få ett svar ...

Känner du till skyltningen på stället? Jag har taggat om till gc-väg. Gör gärna en koll: https://www.google.com/maps/@59.340721,17.6955271,3a,30.2y,300.42h,87.74t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sh6AZwKToHXkwK0-NfsFgBA!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3Dh6AZwKToHXkwK0-NfsFgBA%26cb_client%3Dsearch.revgeo_and_fetch.gps%26w%3D96%26h%3D64%26yaw%3D15.76761%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192?hl=sv

Hej, så routing för fotgängare är inte viktigt? Routingen för dem till busshållplatsen fungerar inte längre sedan du bytte till "cycleway" tillsammans med "bicycle=yes". Vad var anledningen till att du bytte från "footway"+"bicycle=yes" till "cycleway"?

Ja, ich bin mir bewusst, dass das Aufteilen der Strasse nicht geht. Ich habe den maxheight-tagg weggenommen ausser direkt unter der Bruecke.

Hallo, pass auf. ich habe recht viele maxheight in Göteborg getaggt. Wenn du in die wiki reinschaust wirst du merken, dass maxheight-tags nur auf gerade der strecke "unter" dem Höhenhinderniss getaggt werden sollen. Nicht den maxheight-tagg auf der ganzen Strecke, die nichts mit dem Hinderniss zu tun hat. Oder hat sich da etwas geändert? Ich finde das gar nicht gut wie du dies hier auf ganzer Strecke getaggt hast.

..ah, dann verstehe ich wie so etwas zustande kommt. Vielen Dank. Auf gutes, weiteres Gelingen!

way/1075487253

Wieso setzt du hier einen Node ein, der dasselbe Beschreibt wie die Tags fuer das Gebäude?
Sei so nett und radiere deine völlig ueberfluessige Node.

Du har även taggat om varenda väg i det här kvarteret och i grannkvarteret från path till residential (way/514866096).
Varför? Det här är inne i ett bostadskvarter. Varför tyckte du det passar bättre med bilväg här?

Varför har du gjort om dessa vägar till bilvägar (residential): way/24699076 och way/24699067?
Tycks mig vara en gc-väg (https://www.google.com/maps/@59.0568922,12.6759234,3a,75y,287.37h,69.63t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sh3e2fBlUIcM66x1azWZX4Q!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3Dh3e2fBlUIcM66x1azWZX4Q%26cb_client%3Dsearch.revgeo_and_fetch.gps%26w%3D96%26h%3D64%26yaw%3D29.862118%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656?hl=sv).

Hej, varför gjorde du om den här gc-vägen till en bilväg (residential) (way/104736922)?
Har det hänt något med vägen sedan den här bilden togs?
https://www.google.com/maps/@59.04858,12.6868199,3a,44.8y,348.48h,88.94t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sE2-cC1tZK2F14hgAM6z9tg!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DE2-cC1tZK2F14hgAM6z9tg%26cb_client%3Dsearch.revgeo_and_fetch.gps%26w%3D96%26h%3D64%26yaw%3D97.52186%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192?hl=sv

Sorry to disagree @AndersAndersson. This - and the other ones - was a god edit. On signs and in advertisments it is only Naturkompaniet or Systembolaget. The branch-name is never menntioned.
There is really no point in refering to what was on your receipt (you have been a strong believer in what is on your receipts in the past time). In christmas times there are sometimes wiches e g "God Jul" - Merry Christmas, eng) on the receipt. Does this make the name of the shop "Systembolaget God Jul" under christmas time?
What you @Seeking the Edge should have done is putting the suffix in the branch-tag. This would have made your edits nearly perfect!
To sum it up: advertisment and signs is what is important in case of these big chains of shops.
What's on the receipt is - in these cases - country-wide stores - a matter for the accountants and should not have any bearing on names here on osm.
Mind you this is only for those country-wide chain-stores, otherwise I agree with you @AnderAndersson.
By the way. Systembolaget and
Naturkompaniet are leagally ONE entiy. The shops in diffrent citys and towns are pure branch-offices. This applies as well to other consumer-sided-companies here in Sweden.

Den här "restaurangen" kan inte vara särskilt lönsam.

Seriöst? (way/1081168692)