I think - please forgive me if I am wrong - you just deleted a lot of islets (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=76411741).

Das habe ich mir schon gedacht. Dachte aber, dass es etwas hoch-präzises wäre, so wie gps-rtk oder so. Also nur ein Referenzpunkt. Gut danke schön! Uebrigens, die overlay-Karten sind noch immer häufig versetzt. Heidenarbeit das alles richtig auszurichten bevor man anfängt neue Gebiete zu zeichnen. Mach's gut!

/archie

Welche "corrections" wolltes du durch diesen Revert, den du nicht als solchen gekennzeichnet hasst, erreichen?

Hej, jag har tagit mig friheten att göra om travträningsbanan från bridleway. Hoppas att du inte misstycker. Jag tror "trafiken" på bridleway normalt håller betydligt lägre hastighet än "track och horse_racing".

You must be aware that we are not primarily drawing a map as seen on osm.org. We are (in our sparetime) gathering information about geografical items which are stored in a database. This databaseinformation can than be used to make maps or for other purposes. This is the core of osm; database-feeding. The databaseinformation can be used for routing-purposes; eg Garmin. It is therefore important that foot-/bicycleways are tagged right. I have noticed that you retag almost every way bicycle-/footway (wheather it is path och footway or cycleway) into bicycle=designated+foot=designated+highway=cycleway. Well some days ago you tagged highway=footway insted (as ferosiously as you now tag "cycleway"), but changed to cycleway. I commented this and sent you the relevant weblink. It is not the purpose that all foot-/bicycleways are blue on the map but that the ways are tagged right so to facilitate routing. You wan't listen to that and I find it frustrating that you don't grasp this. Furthermore you are doing tit-for-tat-editing. When I change ways, you will change back without relevant comment. That is not a good idea for a community-project like osm. +++ So, remember it's database-gathering, not mapdrawing what this is all about.

Well I do not contest that this is a park. But you yourself are talking of "lummig skog" in your comment. This is tagged as leisure=park with landcover landuse=forest. This is'nt a case of tagging for the renderer? You did this earlier on at Vallarnas Fritidspark as well and on other places in the north; allwas parks. + + + Now that you are talking; what about the other questions about your deletion of buildings, breaking of multipolygons, moving of rocks at sea and mapping fancy breakwater-barriers. Will you please answer, thank you. Why are you changing correct tagging into wrong tagging for combined foot-/cycleways? And this in grand style, without considering routing problems you create. Well give us an answer.

You retagged this (way/725142657/history), before your retagging highway=path. You changed this (way/609313516/history) to highway=footway. How should cyclists behave when they come to the now footway (where cycling is not allowed)? I think you are changeing a great deal of ways without thinking through questions of routing beforehand.

Wrong addressee

Well, this is - I take your word for it - a park-area. It is though forest-cladd. So landuse=forest. I advise you to read: osm.wiki/Landcover

Well, this is - I take your word for it - a park-area. It is though forest-cladd. So landuse=forest. I advise you to read: osm.wiki/Landcover

You just broke mp (relation/10215199/history). What is the reason for this?

You changed the position of a rock (node/4350785418) and created a breakwater barrier (way/740016636). Where is your source for this? I do regularily follow the swedish notice for mariners (Ufs) and have no recollection of this. In counterchecking with swedish ortofoto from Lantmäteriet (the latest availible) I could not spot this breakwater-barrier. It is no trivial thing to move under water hinder or mapping breakwater-barrier. So where are your scource for those mappings?

This (way/738917716) correctly tagged as highway=path. Why do you change correct an valid tags?

You have now put the second layer of "lines" (natural=coastline) upon an existing one (which by the way is included in the relation of coastlines for Halland). So there are now three (3) layers of "lines" upon another. You commented this changeset - as all others - with "Changes to areas and lines not corresponding to underlying map." In which way does "underlying map" (is this possiblly satellite images?) show that there should be three layers of "lines". You would be well adviced to give an answer to this question. Keep in mind, that other active members - all over the world - can read this comment and your answer or absence of answer.

Yes, I just noticed the GraphHopper times. OSRM is good in this. OSRM foot 3:40. I know the localities in Frederikshavn and Göteborg; at a speedy walk you could make it in 3:40. Ah, I think I understand; OSRMs servers are "updated" at certain times? Still OSRM routing for vehicle still not working.

Yes, you are right! But duration 6:22 for foot? Where does this value came from? "OSM directions refresh"??

Det är helt ok.

No, sorry, this is not right. Foot is not allowed to disembark where vehicles drive ashore. That is why i put the amenity=ferry_terminal where passenger-gangway meets ferry. Foot rooting via GraphHopper was ok, all the way through terminal-building at Gothenburg and Frederikshavn. This changed when duration-time was put into way. I don't know if this is barely a coincidence in time or the result of the change.

Ha, OSRM foot routing through terminal building in Frederikshavn and Göteborg working!!

Things are developing: OSRM (bicycle & foot) now working; OSRM vehicle still not. GraphHopper foot not working. + + + So when OSRM vehicle and GraphHopper foot will work, I for my part would be happy.