amurski's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 142220025 | about 2 years ago | Meadow is the correct designation here, as per the wiki: landuse=meadow
|
| 114283063 | about 3 years ago | There is clearly some sort of track on recent Maxar imagery. I don't recall why I tagged it as service road, perhaps the dark colour suggested asphalt but it may be a simple track |
| 112717096 | almost 4 years ago | I have removed them from the relation. |
| 112717096 | almost 4 years ago | Hello, thanks for spotting this. I do not know how they came to be included as I don't recall touching the Saint's Way relation here. |
| 112541119 | about 4 years ago | Hello Andy, thanks so much for fixing that. |
| 107006951 | over 4 years ago | Didn't show it on that occasion, I can't think why |
| 93826752 | about 5 years ago | I don't recall one and I have a GPS trace from running it but with the tree cover it maybe isn't accurate enough. The original line was on the wrong side of the stream. I will run it again in a couple of days and try to get a more accurate measurement |
| 92662937 | about 5 years ago | Oh I see, different changeset. Fixed it. ID editor did something unexpected there. |
| 92662937 | about 5 years ago | no changes to relations appear in the changeset |
| 86300659 | over 5 years ago | Thanks for that I'll take extra care in future to check the edits with big multipolygons before committing anything |
| 86300659 | over 5 years ago | I didn't intentionally remove them. I don't know why josm would remove them simply through adding an inner way with 'update multipolygon'. That multipolygon though is a monstrosity which includes areas that are definitively not Bristol |
| 86252218 | over 5 years ago | Apologies, I have reverted the changeset in that area. Assumed they were part of the old yahoo traced stuff there that gets the validator angry if you touch it. |