OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
164605054 9 months ago

too many nodes fighting for one spot i imagine aha

164605054 9 months ago

lmao i'm gonna group these racks into one object, we will use capacity tag to indicate number of bikes that can fit

163921373 9 months ago

I've visited the location and found no signage or wayfinding that suggests Brownstone Law to exist here. Suite 110, described as the office's location, is a UPS store and extends from both sides of the building. I am removing this POI

163921373 9 months ago

I am reverting this change as the business info tags were placed on the inner building part instead of a separate node. Will replace the POI with it's own node and tags

164261766 9 months ago

RIP

140828953 about 1 year ago

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this road regarded as "boulevard"?

155486367 over 1 year ago

This change includes a node that has been moved incorrectly, I will correct this

150897449 over 1 year ago

I have actually made an app for that!
https://rackfinder.app

It is better to group up racks that are close together that you might consider a "clump". This will reduce clutter on the map and is easier for data queries. Then use the capacity tag to specify how many bikes can fit there. I usually mark the center of the row of stands for the node marker. You can however use an "area" way to draw the boundary of the bike parking area. Only a few are tagged this way but it is valid.

151432356 over 1 year ago

I have reverted this changeset as I have previously mapped the newly opened Sullenberger Aviation Museum which is located here, using the 2024 Mecklenberg nearmap imagery

150897449 over 1 year ago

Please be sure to add "amenity=bicycle_parking" tag to any bike racks you add to the map. This is important metadata to surface in apps which consume this information

146574071 over 1 year ago

Hi, I have removed a couple of these cycle paths you added in this changeset. For roads with painted cycle shoulders, we use tags on the road to indicate them. Dedicated cycle paths will get their own ways.

138995709 over 1 year ago

Btw, the height on buildings is *meters*, not feet. I am converting some of these but keep this in mind in the future. Many buildings in Charlotte have been tagged incorrectly

149147525 over 1 year ago

This business sells shipping supplies such as boxes, packing supplies, and envelopes. They are also an authorized ship center for UPS, Fedex, DHL, USPS. How would you consider tagging this place?

147075651 almost 2 years ago

ahhh sick, way to go man. got some work to do!

147075651 almost 2 years ago

how did you get 24 imagery ?

146343982 almost 2 years ago

I had added those and then removed them in a second edit since they seemed to clutter the map and aren't useful to the public or for navigation. I can update these as private, but should I do them along the entire shoreline?

143592990 about 2 years ago

Users can still enter the capacity manually if they see fit. I should make it clear what the computed capacity will be.

143592990 about 2 years ago

Should it be something included permanently? I can do that easily, this is the original question asked by the user and the capacity is computed automatically depending on the rack type. Users can also opt to enter capacity manually.

143592990 about 2 years ago

It does mark the number of individual "racks", but I did add this as a metadata field in my app, forgot to remove in the payload request so some of these elements still have the tag. You can remove if you like, it's not needed.

143786086 about 2 years ago

I had updated my app from a simple "capacity" field to a more intuitive input that asked, for example "How many stands?", then the capacity will be calculated based on that answer. The altCapacity is that value. I had forgotten to delete that field from the payload data, so it snuck in to a couple of my edits. I will remove.