OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
175613787 4 days ago

Hallo Farald. Ich sehe du hast einen Punkt "Home" zu OpenStreetMap hinzugefuegt. Ich gehe davon aus dass, das ein Irrtum war?! Vor deinem Edit war 20a auf der gegenueberliegenden Seite

175593750 13 days ago

Hi @njmccarthy11 . Welcome to OSM!

You asked for review - the road looks good to me. It's hard to see through the trees on aerial imagery and you anticipated well where it runs. Good job.

I see you are adding this as part of a HOT tasking manager project. Normally there is no need to request review on OSM if you are mapping inside HOT TM. The mapping activities in HOT TM are usually validated there, so you would get feedback automatically if there was anything found wrong.

43478725 19 days ago

Also, Gujarat is not a city and if we're talking about this company: https://www.indofil.com/contact/india-office then I see no location in Dahej

43478725 19 days ago

Hi @Gummireddybharath . Are you quite sure about this? The node is place in the water / wetland along the coast. Nothing visible in aerial imagery. This can't be right.

168040316 27 days ago

After staring at this longer, I think I understand what happened. There used to be a way as part of the railway=disused. Then a stream crossing this railway was added and this section of the way was split off and tagged as a track and a bridge. However that's not correct. I see no reason to tag this as a track. And I see a tunnel under the rail line. In fact the stream is split into two and there are two tunnels. So, I'll
* remove track, bridge and layer
* add the two tunnels and streambranches
* I'll leave the split of the railway line, since I have the feeling re-merging it now will make the edit history even harder to understand

168040316 about 1 month ago

one of the changes in this CS is the introduction of this piece of track: way/1409167606#map=18/-32.235439/28.201548&layers=N it shows up as a disconnected highway in osmose. I'm leaning towards this should not be a track. But in fact, the more I look at it, I'm really doubting whether this should be a bridge

170329021 2 months ago

Hi @mjgk . I'm looking at some osmose issues to followup the hot project 18226: https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#loc=9/-32.3717/28.3062&level=1&item=1xxx%2C2xxx%2C3010%2C3020%2C3030%2C3031%2C3032%2C3033%2C3050%2C3060%2C3070%2C3080%2C3090%2C3091%2C3092%2C3093%2C3100%2C3110%2C3120%2C3130%2C3150%2C3160%2C3161%2C3170%2C3180%2C3190%2C3200%2C3210%2C3220%2C3230%2C3240%2C3250%2C3260%2C3350%2C3360%2C4xxx%2C5020%2C5030%2C5040%2C5050%2C5060%2C5070%2C5080%2C6xxx%2C7xxx%2C8xxx%2C9xxx I see a number of disconnected highways and I see that some of them are following edits from you where it seems you mixed up streams and highways. E.g. this one: way/1421700009/history#map=17/-32.358593/28.403738&layers=N I've made some fixes here: changeset/173367359#map=11/-32.4944/28.3546&layers=N Maybe you review your editing process and maybe you also want to help clean up a bit

173260639 2 months ago

First time I'm touching a coastline. First time I'm touching administrative boundaries. I've checked bing, esri and sentinel-2 imagery and followed esri. I'd appreciate a second pair of eyes on this. I only did a small section for now and intend to continue if there are no big objections to how I'm doing this.

166691951 7 months ago

ah. excuus. ik had me hier https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bag-importverzoeken/3394/3388 niet duidelijk uitgedrukt. Ik bedoelde: De constructie rond het zuidelijke gebouw is afgerond. Rond om de Servaashof zelf zijn ze wel nog bezig. Ik loop nog wel eens langs voor de details. Maar ik heb voor nu wel een constructie terug gezet: changeset/166700998

157529387 8 months ago

fixed the first (zen.nl). don't know anything about the second (Emma)

165498297 8 months ago

I had previously added a fixme because the business was not visible on the map. Now I realized it was mapped as amenity=meditation_center (68 uses as of now and seems to not be shown on osm.org, streetcomplete, osmand, everydoor). I merge the fixme and the amenity into a shop=meditation, which admittedly has even fewer uses (3), but seems more descriptive to me and happens to also at least show up with the name on maps

157529387 8 months ago

Maybe this has been created due to something like this: https://github.com/Zverik/every_door/issues/880 I better check whether I made more of these. Thanks again Mateusz

157529387 8 months ago

made it barrier=yes. I see that street complete shows it as a quest, so additional details can be added later easily

157529387 8 months ago

huh?! amenity=fixme ?! And I did that. That's embarrasing nonsense. Thanks for flagging. Let me check

164942939 8 months ago

ups. seems that was me who turned the boundary into a tram. not sure how that happened. thanks for fixing!

163681318 9 months ago

mhm. mja. ik denk die note toen was ook van mij. ik kwam het nu weer tegen als een osmose foutmelding en dacht dat intermittent toen gewoon niet gefixt werd.

158258699 about 1 year ago

bedankt!

154482959 over 1 year ago

👍

154482959 over 1 year ago

based on photos here: note/4270477#map=19/51.40893/5.53301