sorry but this feature already exists way/314946608

I still think we should map platform roof's separately. It lets you distinguish how much of each platform is covered by a roof, would be hard to capture that with just the covered tag as you need to split the area into covered and non-covered, which I don't think is a good idea. A separate building=roof makes that easy.

See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2019-March/012493.html I just updated the railway=station way to cover the larger area.

"A structure that consists of a roof with open sides, such as a rain shelter, and also gas stations" so it applies to any roof structure.

Is this what you meant by the station area way/34891023

Sorry but I disagree here. +1 to adding the covered tag, but building=roof is an accepted way to tag roofs.

Did you want to reinstate them?

looks good to me!

Great, thank you!

I think "The Beach" is correct. https://wetnwildsydney.com.au/things-to-do/park-map uses the same name.

not sure where you got the details for node/1811205304 from, but on the ground I could find no evidence of a camp ground here...

node/2973139578 doesn't seem right, I can't see any peak here and node/4379806104 is mapped, so I've deleted this node. If you had any local knowledge, please advise.

I noticed in this changeset you changed a couple of highway=footway to highway=track.

highway=track highway=track is only for when the path is wide enough for a 4 wheel vehicle, if not it's just highway=footway or highway=path.

node/4379806104

There's no infrastructure here or path here, nor any spot to stop on the side of the road, so I think we should delete this one.

Sorry I've accidentally uploaded local data, not intended to be uploaded. I've cleaned that up now. Thanks for letting me know!

It's a sewer conduit, either SWSOOS 1 or SWSOOS 2.

Some kind of pipeline, but I wasn't sure so I left it untagged. I've now added the tag, but still needs a survey.

ok, seems fine. Thanks for posting the details here.

Hi this is a public map, please don't upload your private bookmarks. I've reverted this change.

Hi this is a public map, please don't upload your private bookmarks. I've reverted this change.

Hi this is a public map, please don't upload your private bookmarks. I've reverted this change.

"Even it is not accordance to OSM guideline" could you point to where you formed that view? My understanding from the wiki documentation is that highway=footway + bicycle=designated is the correct tagging for this way, because the path is "(explicit) sign saying something like bicycles allowed" and a path mainly used by pedestrians.