I see on node/3566625894/history you've used tourism=resort. tourism=resort seems to indicate leisure=resort is a better fit, do you still prefer tourism=resort?

okay done.

I just walked the Devils Hole track, and there were markers and a track further north than the way you originally added, way/56117624/history.

How accurate was your original path? I'm trying to work out if we should keep both options in there or not.

My trace is @aharvey/traces/2963469

was deleted, no attraction here

no reply, was deleted

no reply, I've deleted all of these.

this waterfall was already mapped so I deleted it

re the changes around Mandalong Road / Pacific Motorway, a road is only mapped as separate parallel ways where there is a physical barrier between, otherwise if it's just different turn lanes you'd have one way with the turn lanes tag.

It looks like from the imagery here there is a physical barrier separating each direction? In that case we should splt the road into two oneway roads.

I accidentally circled the track here, but I've since fixed it up.

Thanks!

FYI I deleted way/677568453 since it was already mapped by way/646291757

okay, I just changed this back

For consistency I think we should try to keep station name formats consistent. Right now most are without the "Station" or "Train Station" suffix.

Do you think it's better to just use the short name?

I didn't think the network tag applied to the station, instead applying to the route relation. Since the station could be part of multiple networks, the network is related to the route instead of the station?

For way/78300474/history are you sure the previous name was incorrect?

Hey David, I'm so sorry about messing up here. You're right I should have checked with you first, via a changeset comment, since you set it to construction.

ok I've copied across the rest of the tags and deleted the old school

No worries!

and the address is already mapped at node/2580027064

I deleted the one you added in favour of the existing mapped feature