OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
51289769 almost 7 years ago

Sorry I've accidentally uploaded local data, not intended to be uploaded. I've cleaned that up now. Thanks for letting me know!

64835919 almost 7 years ago

It's a sewer conduit, either SWSOOS 1 or SWSOOS 2.

64835919 almost 7 years ago

Some kind of pipeline, but I wasn't sure so I left it untagged. I've now added the tag, but still needs a survey.

51397613 almost 7 years ago

ok, seems fine. Thanks for posting the details here.

44504719 almost 7 years ago

Hi this is a public map, please don't upload your private bookmarks. I've reverted this change.

44410681 almost 7 years ago

Hi this is a public map, please don't upload your private bookmarks. I've reverted this change.

55565841 almost 7 years ago

Hi this is a public map, please don't upload your private bookmarks. I've reverted this change.

51251925 almost 7 years ago

"Even it is not accordance to OSM guideline" could you point to where you formed that view? My understanding from the wiki documentation is that highway=footway + bicycle=designated is the correct tagging for this way, because the path is "(explicit) sign saying something like bicycles allowed" and a path mainly used by pedestrians.

49812681 almost 7 years ago

Normally I would agree, but in this case they are all the one feature on the ground.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/136319147@N08/35558842005

The survey mark is at the peak which is part of the picnic table and roof... all one feature on the ground so all one object in OSM.

This is noted in my note "This point is both the peak of the mountain, the physical survey point on a roof over picnic tables, hence all tags are valid in combination at this point."

51251925 almost 7 years ago

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-33.96372222222223&lng=151.15543611111116&z=17&pKey=lhRimvFZxJNXRBF6l5snMw&focus=photo&x=0.449782564727345&y=0.5131537845591562&zoom=1.2966360856269112

51251925 almost 7 years ago

* I mean highway=footway, bicycle=designated

51251925 almost 7 years ago

in response to ^, this path on the ground is highway=footway as it's primarily for pedestrians, however signage indicates that bicycles are designated, hence why I've used highway=footway + footway=cycleway.

51251925 almost 7 years ago

> Dear aharvey,
>
> While I was doing fixing logical Osmose issues, I found an error “suspicious tag combination – highway=footway together with bicycle=designated” (coordinate: -33.9640122, 151.1553117, wayID: 516799329).
>
> As I understood based on wiki OSM (highway=footway), where a pathway is designated for pedestrians but is also allowed for bicycles you can use highway=footway and bicycle=yes, or cycleway=* if there is a cycle path on the same way. Highway=footway tag only goes in combination with foot=designated but not specially designated route for bicycle.
>
> One of solutions can be to change the bicycle tag from designated to values yes, if bicycle traffic is allowed, or to remove bicycle tag and add cycleway=* tag.
>
> Maybe, better solution can be to remove bicycle=designated tag, change highway=footway to highway=cycleway and to add segregated=no tag if they share one lane.
>
> If you a have different understanding of this tag combination tag than me, then please explain so we can find the best solution.
>
> Best regards,
> AndjelaS

67679021 almost 7 years ago

Please keep in mind that you shouldn't use maps.six.nsw.gov.au as a source, we only have permission to use the Web Services http://spatialservices.finance.nsw.gov.au/mapping_and_imagery/lpi_web_services. Although most of the time it would be the same data, it's not good practice to rely on that.

67313396 almost 7 years ago

could you please specify a unit for the parking maxstay? way/479478321

65538774 almost 7 years ago

I'd also be okay with a revert of this import, due to the quality issues uncovered until they can be resolved.

61363957 almost 7 years ago

I've fixed this.

Are you really sure there is a culvert where Heathcote Brook intersects the Karloo Track?

61160835 almost 7 years ago

I've made some changes, I've brought back way/31804884/history it's better to retain existing ways where possible, as it makes it easier to see the history of the object.

Also see osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only the name tag should just be the name, ie. "Uloola Falls Trail" not "Uloola Falls Trail - Heathcote To Waterfall", I've reverted this back for you, but keep in mind for next time.

Re https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/42791553 motor_vehicle=yes means the public can drive here, which is not the case, I've changed this to motor_vehicle=private which is the default for highway=track, so not essential to tag, but not wrong either.

7680901 almost 7 years ago

Thank you!

61363957 almost 7 years ago

Hey I just walked here today and there's no bridge at way/614134022