aharvey's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 68445709 | over 6 years ago | For consistency I think we should try to keep station name formats consistent. Right now most are without the "Station" or "Train Station" suffix. Do you think it's better to just use the short name? |
| 68445709 | over 6 years ago | I didn't think the network tag applied to the station, instead applying to the route relation. Since the station could be part of multiple networks, the network is related to the route instead of the station? |
| 68775548 | over 6 years ago | For way/78300474/history are you sure the previous name was incorrect? |
| 68609720 | over 6 years ago | Hey David, I'm so sorry about messing up here. You're right I should have checked with you first, via a changeset comment, since you set it to construction. |
| 64553832 | over 6 years ago | ok I've copied across the rest of the tags and deleted the old school |
| 68531996 | over 6 years ago | No worries! |
| 68531996 | almost 7 years ago | and the address is already mapped at node/2580027064 |
| 68531996 | almost 7 years ago | I deleted the one you added in favour of the existing mapped feature |
| 68531996 | almost 7 years ago | sorry but this feature already exists way/314946608 |
| 68390352 | almost 7 years ago | I still think we should map platform roof's separately. It lets you distinguish how much of each platform is covered by a roof, would be hard to capture that with just the covered tag as you need to split the area into covered and non-covered, which I don't think is a good idea. A separate building=roof makes that easy. |
| 68390352 | almost 7 years ago | See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2019-March/012493.html I just updated the railway=station way to cover the larger area. |
| 68390352 | almost 7 years ago | "A structure that consists of a roof with open sides, such as a rain shelter, and also gas stations" so it applies to any roof structure. Is this what you meant by the station area way/34891023 |
| 68390352 | almost 7 years ago | Sorry but I disagree here. +1 to adding the covered tag, but building=roof is an accepted way to tag roofs. Did you want to reinstate them? |
| 68509311 | almost 7 years ago | looks good to me! |
| 68492087 | almost 7 years ago | Great, thank you! |
| 68494171 | almost 7 years ago | I think "The Beach" is correct. https://wetnwildsydney.com.au/things-to-do/park-map uses the same name. |
| 67120000 | almost 7 years ago | not sure where you got the details for node/1811205304 from, but on the ground I could find no evidence of a camp ground here... |
| 24274484 | almost 7 years ago | node/2973139578 doesn't seem right, I can't see any peak here and node/4379806104 is mapped, so I've deleted this node. If you had any local knowledge, please advise. |
| 32003031 | almost 7 years ago | I noticed in this changeset you changed a couple of highway=footway to highway=track. highway=track highway=track is only for when the path is wide enough for a 4 wheel vehicle, if not it's just highway=footway or highway=path. |
| 41858552 | almost 7 years ago |
There's no infrastructure here or path here, nor any spot to stop on the side of the road, so I think we should delete this one. |