sounds like it should also have bridge=boardwalk

reverting since this doesn't look right and no comment or justification was given.

relation/9487066 is the route_master

fyi note/4618878 regarding node/7911236708/history

Thanks! Yes that was my mistake, fixed now.

node/5261267190/history

from what I can see, there's no restrictions on walking or cycling over the ford so I'll remove those access tags you added.

I've restored the way but changed the tags to be a private driveway rather than public street.

reverted

reverted

could you please provide further information about why the field is no longer there? if you provide this in the changeset comment it helps other mappers understand why the changes were made, without this justification and due to the dragged node I've reverted this changeset.

it can also be helpful to map out what's there instead (if the field is no longer there).

I've reverted this as the only change was to drag the node, going by your changeset comment it seems like you knew something went wrong, why did you proceed to upload it then?

your changes resulted in a number of overlaping ways, so I've cleaned this up, however I'm not sure about the tags for each of the resulting segments.

Unless I'm mistaken, the data extracted for the quest only records these as "tower" so it doesn't specify if it's a chimney or a communications tower, many of the other data points are for chimneys so I think it's very likely this one is for the chimney.

On the Esri imagery the shadows cast to the west, so if there was a comms tower there you'd expect to see a shadow but there's none, only the chimney.

On Bing to me it just looks like some stockpiled equipment on the ground.

Either way if in doubt probably best to not map it and leave a note or fixme.

same comment as changeset/169898102

In this case I believe it would be best to mark the comms tower as a node, and per the wiki this is likely to be man_made=mast not man_made=tower.

industrial=communication is considered a sub-tag of landuse=industrial, it further specifies the type of industrial landuse, so you need landuse=industrial as well.

Unless the tower footprint has significant area, I think it's best to map the tower as a node. The area you've traced out here should be a landuse=industrial and potentially with industrial=communication.

The whole area isn't a building so shouldn't have building=yes, there does appear to be something within the site, it might be a building or it might be industrial equipment, but if you wanted you could trace it as building=yes or building=service.

I can't see any comms tower here on Bing or DCS imagery, I believe the Base map tower here is the chimney just to the SW of the node, it's most visible on the Esri imagery.

also for bridge:name at least I thought it could be kept on the highway.

I read bridge:name=* which while it says it's prefered to use man_made=bridge + name it doesn't directly say that it shouldn't/can't co-exist with bridge:name so I'm not sure, I just thought that perhaps it's a good idea to retain it rather than delete it.

I checked the 3 main routing engines but none appear to use bridge:name.

way/172868419 we should leave the bridge tags on the way, it's helpful for routing engines to also announce the bridge name as part of the route without needing to process the bridge area and apply those tags to the way.

My understanding from the Royal National Park is that if you're driving straight through from Loftus to Otford via Audley and don't stop you don't need to buy a national park pass, however in that case the road is considered a public road excluded from the park. I thought the same applied to all other parks, so driving through Riverside Drive here without stopping doesn't need a pass, but I'm not sure... The national parks website seems to indicate that if your vehicle enters the park you need a pass.

node/6635352711/history and some others were just deleted, but I don't know enough about train signalling to know if it should have been...