Yeah I think it's not right to add this to watercourses outside of a golf course.

I've reverted this change since added layer=-1 to seemingly ground level buildings which seemingly was done to silence editor warnings.

I've reverted this change since it removed the building type.

sorry I didn't see your change here, I just reverted the problematic change.

I've reverted this change since it deleted all the tags per each semi, and regardless it's better to have each semi mapped individually.

changeset/173857036

layer=* implies one building is over or under another, but if both are at ground level then it's unlikely adding a layer=* is the correct way to resolve overlapping buildings.

changeset/173856994

from the imagery this building does appear to exist so I've reverted this deletion, though it needs a survey to confirm.

in the processed deleting the building to replace it with individual buildings you've lost some tags like building=retail and building:levels, where possible these should be retained.

layer=* implies one building is over or under another, but if both are at ground level then it's unlikely adding a layer=* is the correct way to resolve overlapping buildings.

changeset/173856773

layer=* implies one building is over or under another, but if both are at ground level then it's unlikely adding a layer=* is the correct way to resolve overlapping buildings.

changeset/173856773

layer=1 implies one building is over the other, but that's unlikely here they are both likely at ground level.

Edgeroi is already mapped at relation/5793377 as a place=hamlet. I've reverted this change since it created a duplicate place for Edgeroi.

unit 3 is already mapped at node/12416900561 and this address is already mapped as addr:unit=1.

I've reverted this change.

you can add multiple buildings in one changeset, then save at the end rather than creating a changeset for each building.

Thanks for fixing it, sorry from the outside it looked like apartments but I didn't check any signs or entrances.

What's there now? If it's a construction site best to use landuse=construction.

Where was the data for these sourced from?

relation/2386039 already exists so node/13133160273 is a duplicate.

Nice work!

you can add service=driveway to specify the type of service road and also driveway=pipestem to mark it as a shared driveway.

sorry my mistake, you've already applied that to the true boardwalk sections