aharvey's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 77105030 | about 6 years ago | Hi welcome to OSM. The Homemaker Center was already tagged at way/554571579, unless you know this butcher that you've replaced no longer exists? I've reverted this change in line with osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element. |
| 77106755 | about 6 years ago | Hi, welcome to OSM. Generally I'd just consider this one large car parking area, so would use one big way to cover the whole parking area rather than breaking it up into smaller ways, see osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element. |
| 77149073 | about 6 years ago | There's no way to revert a review request, however some of roads are a bit more major than just residential, some are used quite a bit for through traffic getting around the suburb so probably should be higher than just residential. |
| 77152061 | about 6 years ago | same for the node at node/6981822133/history |
| 77152061 | about 6 years ago | also node/6981822135/history this is actually the exit of the carpark, so it's not quite correct to have this tag here. |
| 77152061 | about 6 years ago | Actually I wait to see what you say, I might be wrong, it's been a while since I was there last. |
| 77152061 | about 6 years ago | Hi welcome to OSM. I in your changeset here https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77152061 you've deleted the exit at the northern end, from the lower ground level. Did something change recently? I'll change it back in the meantime. |
| 77154158 | about 6 years ago | Hi welcome to OSM. Is this road signposted as "bus only", in that case the best tags to use are: bus=designated + motor_vehicle=no. The tags you've used currently imply that private vehicles are allowed. |
| 77156266 | about 6 years ago | Hi, where you added Officeworks and Domayne to the address nodes, these two were already mapped at way/179623092 and way/179623091. Per one feature, one osm element osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element we should only have "officeworks" once here, so I've removed the one you added to the address node. |
| 77156350 | about 6 years ago | also this one I've fixed up see https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77600325/. |
| 77156469 | about 6 years ago | Hi welcome to OSM. This wasn't quite right, I've fixed it up. Specifically maxspeed:conditional is the tag key and the 40... is the tag value. |
| 77162341 | about 6 years ago | I see you've used service=driveway which is correct, but you'll also need to use highway=service instead of highway=residential. See service=driveway |
| 38679829 | about 6 years ago | Your original building https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/411511870 was recently deleted in https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77204977/ If you had any local knowledge on which one is correct, please chime in. |
| 77187951 | about 6 years ago | Hi welcome to OSM. It looks like you've deleted the two turn restrictions that already existing here and then re-added the same turn restrictions or was there some other change you made? I've reinstated the original turn relations. |
| 77188077 | about 6 years ago | FYI without the oneway tag, it's assumed two way by default. |
| 77249811 | about 6 years ago | +1 change is good thanks. Though I couldn't help but find the humour in this edit https://twitter.com/alantgeo/status/1199464023198027776. |
| 77253560 | about 6 years ago | Hi and welcome to OSM. You've tagged a few small areas here as leisure=park. A leisure=park, leisure=park is meant for "an area of open space for recreational use". Without knowing what exactly these are it's hard to recommend an alternative tag, but you can just tag individual trees as natural=tree. |
| 77295705 | about 6 years ago | Hi welcome to OSM. Since this is a fairly major change that does break the rendering, and it has been extensively discussed on the talk-au mailing list previously, I've reverted this for now until it can be discussed. Feel free to discuss this here or on the talk-au list. |
| 77295839 | about 6 years ago | Hi welcome to OSM. Bundeena Bay is already mapped at node/910343349 as a bay and the water area covered by Gunnamatta Bay and Port Hacking is already mapped out. Since this is a fairly major change that does break the rendering, and it has been extensively discussed on the talk-au mailing list previously, I've reverted this for now until it can be discussed. Feel free to discuss this here or on the talk-au list. |
| 77448562 | about 6 years ago | You're right, in the imagery I can see the dashed centerline, so it's not oneway. Thanks. |