acres1nvented's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 129571668 | about 3 years ago | Haha, yes I actually did the survey before I even saw your edit, I was surprised to see the map already had the buildings I'd just surveyed! Thanks for pointing that out - the hazards of mapping multiple cities :') |
| 93751961 | about 4 years ago | Hi there,
|
| 71198588 | over 4 years ago | I checked on the street sign on the ground and it's definitely Clarence with an e, I have fixed it. I find those estate maps are often not 100% accurate. |
| 90996865 | over 4 years ago | I think you are right, it does seem to be marked as a road over the yards in historical maps. I believe I must have assumed when surveying form the architecture that it was part of the rail track to the yards. I agree on your tag suggestion, please go ahead and change it or I am happy to if you would like. |
| 100160118 | almost 5 years ago | Out of interest, would highway=tertiary be a more appropriate tag for the areas of TCR you've classed as highway=service? This is a route that is heavily used by cyclists as well as just buses, and has much traffic outside of hours, so classifying it as just a busway, even with the new restrictions, feels odd to me? Interested to hear your thoughts as TCR is in a fairly niche category of bus gated but large roads |
| 97312154 | almost 5 years ago | No worries! Glad someone else is mapping around this area! |
| 97312154 | about 5 years ago | Are you sure York Mews is private? I know the area well and specifically surveyed the area including York Mews recently. There are no gates or barriers preventing physical access, and as far as I can tell York Mews is a council managed road, with no form of private restriction. There's no particular reason to go down what is essentially a dead end service road, but that does not make it private. What are your thoughts? |
| 94539797 | about 5 years ago | Do we think this is the best place for this node? If we look an an old map of St Pancras parish: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/59/LONDON%2C_MARYLEBONE_by_BARTLETT%2C_F.A._and_B.J._DAVIES.jpg (in yellow), this is mere metres from the boundary of the old parish. I would suggest that, if we have the node at all (given how St Pancras is a fairly historical designation), that the node should be closer to the St Pancras Old Church, to the north of St Pancras station. I'm interested to hear your thoughts. |
| 89108010 | over 5 years ago | I agree with domi_id; it also specifically states on several entrances to the canal that it is a footpath where considerate cycling is permitted. I suggest that we instead revert to tagging the towpath as highway=footway, bicycle=yes. Thoughts? |
| 89822317 | over 5 years ago | Can I ask what the source is for this name? I was under the impression that the whole square is Torrington Square and can't find a source for this bit of it being named Birkbeck patio? |