aceman444's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 114102210 | almost 4 years ago | Zdravim, aky je problem s tymi dvojitymi ciarkami? Slovak Lines dopravca mal takto oznacene zastavky, cize to bolo spravne, nie preklep. Zda sa, ze ARRIVA to uz tak nema, ale to ako zdroj neuvadzate. |
| 118666610 | almost 4 years ago | Ma to byt highway=platform. A public_transport=platform tam nema byt, kedze je to uz na tych bodoch nastupist. Ak to domaci volaju aj "kricek", dajme to do znacky loc_name. |
| 116730351 | almost 4 years ago | Of course, when there are 2 concurrent tagging proposals, none of them will say it is wrong. But as none of them is approved, there is no point in converting one to the other. Yes, indoor mapping is problematic in OSM yet. |
| 113916664 | almost 4 years ago | Nie, ani pri stavbe elektricky sa tu nic nezmenilo, znacky zdielanej cyklocesty idu okolo kanala, nie cez most. Skuste prestat s tymi bludmi po Bratislave. |
| 39091280 | almost 4 years ago | Zdravim, ani dnes tam ziadnu kamennu predajnu nie je vidiet. Na vydajnu e-shopu uz dnes existuje navrhovana znacka shop=outpost . To 'eshop' v nazve je podla mna tiez sporne, na ich stranke pouzivaju aj verziu s tymto slovom ale aj bez. |
| 118666610 | almost 4 years ago | Dakujem za fotky, no je to na nich este dost rozostavane, ale nejake chodniky, ci nastupiste sa tam uz crta. Cisla nastupist uz su zadane, na bodoch ako node/3901058028, pomocou znacky local_ref. Podla mna plocha way/187995249 nie je potrebna, a uz vobec nie so znackou public_transport=platform, lebo ta uz je na spominanych bodoch, ktore reprezentuju nastupistia.
Tie linky autobusov som uz opravil.
|
| 119280108 | almost 4 years ago | No validators should suggest any changes based on a wiki page of a tag that was never voted on/approved. But I have changed it to indoor=yes, which is allowed on a way even based on that dubious wiki page. |
| 116730351 | almost 4 years ago | We don't use indoor=corridor in the city, it was probably just an experiment from me to add a more precise value instead of indoor=yes. I did not notice it should be an area, even though as I said, that unapproved wiki page has no saying in this matter. I will convert the ways to indoor=yes so that they do not attract any more invalid conversions. It seems map roulette only identifies possible problems, it did not suggest you to change it to highway=corridor. That sees to be your decision and that is what I dispute. Because that tag is even less popular than indoor. |
| 116730351 | almost 4 years ago | Yes, if indoor=corridor should be an area, and we do not have an arrea here, the correct fix would be to change it to indoor=yes, which can be on an unclosed way. You can also notice whole 'indoor' key status is only 'de facto' and was never approved, it is just one possible way to map indoor corridors. As such, the iD editor and map roulette have no business proposing any changes to or from it as any such suggestion is invalid. Unvoted/unapproved tag wiki page cannot be decided if it is incorrect. It is just someones random opinion on a tag and how it should be used. There must not exist any automatic corrections or tasks (maproulette) based on this wiki page, especially suggesting conversions to even less popular tags (highway=corridor). iD editor is known to make wrong suggestions and even damaging automatic corrections. Please don't ever use it for automated mass changes. |
| 116730351 | almost 4 years ago | The whole change is problematic. There is no reason for the ways to be areas. The highway=corridor is an unapproved tag, where as the indoor=corridor mapping is much more widespread (see indoor=*). So as such this changeset will be reverted and if you got such a task from maproulette it seems bogus as a whole and you should report it to the authors. |
| 118666610 | almost 4 years ago | Zdravim, trochu opatrnejsie prosim, zial na zastavkach Zeleny kricek aj Hospodarska cerp. st. ste poskodili relacie liniek MHD. Napr. vymaz bodu node/3901057995 bol zbytocny a narobil skody. Tie plosne nastupistia ako way/1041686939 som teda nepochopil, pisete, ze je tam prestavba, mate nejake fotky, ze by sme to posudili? |
| 114662097 | almost 4 years ago | Better changset descriptions please: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 110469159 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, why is the bus driving on the platform for passengers? It drives a service road so the previous state was correct and your change does not make sense. Similarly road way/977910859 should not exist, it is not separated from the main road. |
| 113276900 | almost 4 years ago | You say it is confectionary shop but do not mark it as such. |
| 113712227 | almost 4 years ago | Hi, how are those pedestrians prohibited on those roads? Show me the traffic signs. Thanks
|
| 117527837 | almost 4 years ago | A na ceste way/46043105 ked zmenite hodnotu na "none" to neznamena, ze tam bezna doprava nemoze v tom pruhu ist. Iba, ze tam nie je ziadne znacenie na ceste. Pristup vozidiel sa znaci znackami vehicle:lanes a pod. No uvidite ked to urobim. |
| 117527837 | almost 4 years ago | Na ceste
|
| 117538117 | almost 4 years ago | node/9514915767 ked je tam zakazane prechadzat, ma byt len crossing=no, ostatne znacky su zbytocne (pozrite crossing=no). Prosim nevymyslajte si znacky ako illegal a unauthorized, kde to nie je potrebne. |
| 117527837 | almost 4 years ago | way/1032619190 zase maxspeed:advised (neznama znacka)? Dopravna znacka odporucanej rychlosti (biele cislo na modrej tabulke) sa znaci maxspeed:advisory. Ale taka tam asi nie je. Ak ste odvazny si odhadnut akou rychlostou sa tam asi da ist, tak na to je maxspeed:practical. Nie som uplne nadseny z tej cesty way/1032619190, ale asi je to lepsie ako tahat dopravu dokola cez way/7598325 . |
| 117525288 | almost 4 years ago | Zdravim, ked teda menite nazvy ulic, pozor aj na aktualizaciu znaciek ako name:etymology:wikidata=Q267888 a wikidata=Q26258962, ktore sa stale odvolavaju na Trnavsku ulicu. A aky je teda zdroj nazvov? Ziadny ste neuviedli. A pozor na tie preklepy (Rozznavska). |