As you can see, the relation of tram 5 is tagged disused:route=tram, thus it is disabled and does not work as a public transport relation in OSM. It could have been deleted, but we keep it for the future when the tram 5 is restored by the operator. Anyway the relation does not have any functional tag so it does not affect anything and I wonder where it did bother you. You can see e.g. tram 4 is a completely separate tram line and relation at relation/1902049 and has absolutely no relation to tram 5. It does not replace the tram nor the relation in OSM so I still have no idea what you are talking about. Start of operation of lines 4 and 9 (to different destinations than 5) does in no way cause the relation of tram 5 to be unneeded (but disabled for now).

Uz, uplne zle :( Tie krizovatky (napr. Male Krasnany) boli uplne dobre, cesta sa ma odpajat tam, kde sa fyzicky oddeluje a uz nie je mozne zmenit jazdny pruh (a fyzickou barierou, nie len plnou ciarou). Nie tam kde zacina odbocovaci pruh. Ostatne zmeny vyzeraju dobre, dakujem. Takze sa to neda odvolat ako celok, ale musim to pracne prerobit naspat :(

Hi, what is the point of this change? Why putting a note about lines 4 and 9 to relation representing tram line 5? Those trams are in separate relations so what did you try to do here?

Zdravim, ta way/847208837 nebude 'raceway'?

Also touching the building extent (using low-res Bing) does not seem useful, but fixing the tennis pitches looks OK, thanks.

The British International School name is already tagged on the school grounds, why adding it to one of the buildings too? It's a duplicate and actually does nothing, as just a name does not make a school (amenity=school tag is needed too, but it already exists on the school grounds).

Also, how do you know the road way/23043917 is oneway? You only quote the outdated and low res Bing imagery, but you can't see traffic signs on bing. But it can be seen that at the south end at the roundabout the road has 2 lanes, apparently for each direction.
Please quote your real sources properly and explain this change.

Please use more descriptive changeset comments than "random edits", see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Hi, Bing is really outdated in Slovakia, please use ESRI and Maxar imagery, or best high res is Ortofotomozaika SR, albeit sometimes older than Maxar/ESRI. The buildings you added do not exist anymore.

Hi, what Air/Drone photography are you using? On some objects you put source=Bing, but those roads aren't on the outdated Bing photos yet, so that is suspicious. Also, you are regularly missing to add common node where a road and a footway intersect. Those nodes are needed for proper pedestrian routing (sometimes they have to use the road if there is no sidewalk or it is not mapped yet).

Zdravim, neviem ci je vhodne na tieto male budovy v meste davat power=substation. Ako ste prisli na tuto koncepciu? Skor tam davame len dovnutra budovy jeden bod power=transformer.

Zdravim, ako viete, ze v tom vedeni je 22000 V? Je tam poznamka, ze je mozno nepouzivane. Tak bud ta poznamka nie je pravdiva a treba ju dat prec, alebo Vasa zmena nie je pravdiva. Ako ste to napatie zistili?

This road is not oneway. Marked "likely oneway" by some website is not proof enough. You must see on the site for what the real situation is. Do not introduce invalid data into OSM and damage roads in Slovakia.

Zdravim, neposuvajte prosim body, kde sa odpajaju cesty, ako napr. node/30692852 na nahodne miesta. Cesta sa ma odpajat, tam kde sa cesty fyzicky rozdeluju, nie kde sa uz neda preradit medzi jazdnymi pruhmi kvoli plnej ciare. Napr. sanitka sa preradit moze. Nastudujte osm.wiki/Cs:J%C3%ADzdn%C3%AD_pruhy#D.C3.A1lnice . A komentare ako "Zákaz vjezdu vyjma vozidel údržby" treba dat do znacky 'fixme', nech to niekto iny opravi, ked neviete znacky spravne zadat, urcite nie do 'name'. Cela tato sada zmien ma minimalny prinos: posun hlavnych tepien v Bratislave o par centimetrov podla nepresneho Bingu a posun oddelovacih vetiev ciest na nespravne miesta.

Preco by to malo byt zbytocne?

Zdravim, mne sa zda, ze ked je ford na ceste, tak by mala mat aj highway, lebo inak ako sa po tom useku bude routovat?
way/228932824

Zdravim, prosim piste zmysluplne popisy sad zmien: osm.wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn . "Doplnene" je fakt o nicom.

Chcel som povedat, ze relacia prichadzala z Vcelarskej, isla po juznej casti Radnicneho namesia a odchadzala na Strukovu. Tym, ze ste spojili tie tri vetvy Radnicneho namestia do jednej cesty, dostalo sa cele toto V do relacie a takato cyklotrasa uz nedavala zmysel.

Zdravim, nespajajte nahodne cesty do jednej (v tomto pripade zapadnu,juznu a vychodnu vetvu Radnicneho namestia), ked po nich vedu relacie (tu cyklotrasa relation/2733343). Editor iD je v tomto extra zly, tak mozno ste si to ani nevsimli, ze tam ta trasa je. Tak kym pouzivate tento editor, radsej takto nespajajte cesty.

Pridavat vsade barrier=kerb kde existuje kerb=* je podla wiki tiez nezmysel, pouzivaju sa na inych miestach, na inych objektoch. Ten iD je fakt debilny. Kedy odvolate vsetky tieto Vase sady zmien?