way/380152147 - building=commercial? The restaurant is inside the building and does not occupy the whole building (at least as it is tagged now), so adding building= to it is wrong (you made a building inside a building, about which iD should complain (this time correctly)).

No myslim, ze objekty su uplne odlisneho typu (jedno je administrativna hranica, zrejme katastralne uzemie) a to druhe je rozsah zastavaneho uzemia s place=town. Ak uz je duplicita tak s node/26037632, ktore tiez reprezentuje to mesto (je tam dokonca place=city, to by sa malo zjednotit). Ak OSM hladanie (zrejme myslite len jedno z moznych vyhladavani a to na stranke osm.org), vracia 'hranice vesnice' a 'mesto', tak je to podla mna spravne a nie je to 'to same', su tym reprezentovane 2 rozne uzemia.

Dakujem.

Neviem, ja to neznacim, videl so ludi tam davat highway=pedestrian (ked je to asfaltovane, hoci aj s obrubnikom), ale to je blbost, kedze chodci tam nikdy nechodia a nie je to pesia zona. area:highway=traffic_island som velmi nevidel, ale mate pravdu ze to existuje ako neschvaleny navrh na osm.wiki/Proposed_features/Street_area#traffic_island , len tam nie je popis co to presne ma byt, cize nevieme ci sa tym mysli tento typ objektu. Podla mna kludne pouzivajte, budem aj ja, aspon som sa nieco naucil :)

Hej :)

So I went checking the place and really steps at way/859558580 do not exist and only part of way/859558581 is asphalt. So either you weren't there, or you used the editor wrongly as the presentation of OSM data may be overwhelming to you so far. That's what we are trying to help you here so that you do not do the same class of mistakes again.

I don't know what you find passive aggressive in this changeset comment, you asked for examples of mistakes in the other changeset, so I also commented this one. You do not need to prove where you live, it is not important. But "I live there" (which you now used twice instead of any other explanation) is no proof that the OSM changes are correct. They may be just technically wrong, not that the object does not exist, and need to be done in the different way (as I said in some cases at the other changesets).

Also, you twist your arguments now, as you said the editor didn't propose the changes, but in the changeset description you said that it did (even mistaking openstreetmap with a specific iD editor).

So it is up to you now to learn from your mistakes and explain the issues I have pointed out, why you did them and we can discuss them.

Ano, ked to preznacite pomocou znaciek 'turn', budeme spokojni :) Mohli ste to urobit rovno vtedy, kedze ta schema existovala, a naopak nepamatam, ze by existovala schema robit paralelne cesty ako ste ich urobili (skor naopak, mozno raz pride).
Uz vobec mi nedava zmysel rozdelenie pruhov medzi cestami
way/128651495
way/642894579
(ked uz delenie, spravne by bolo rozdelit na 3 pruhy k Racianskej a 1 od nej, kedze tak je umiestnena je dvojita ciara).

Opravil som krizovatku Detvianska/Puchovska, pre porovnanie:
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=94392769

Na zamer som sa nespytal, kedze sa dal odhadnut podla toho, ze to sedelo na maxar/ofmozaiku, len to bolo urobene zlym sposobom.

Som rad, ze sledujete forum. Moj nazor nie je vzdy spravny, ale zrejme viete spocitat, ze dost casto bol.

Ak to teda viete urobit cez 'turn', budem rad a ospravedlnujem sa za sposob zacatia komentara. Zial, narazam na kopu nicitelov.

To je presne ta cesta, ktoru ste tu zmenili. Ktora je ta druha duplicitna cesta?

To akoze hadate napatie podla typu stlpov? Ale nefunkcne vedenie vy vyzeralo presne rovnako, nevidite, ci tam tecie prud. Predpokladal, by som ze musite zadat len udaje overitelne na mieste, alebo podla spolahlivych a povolenych zdrojov.

OK, ked to tak niekde robia, asi to moze mat nejaky zmysel, v elektroinfrastrukture sa nevyznam. Povedal som, ze transformer davame ako bod dovnutra budovy, co je presne podla tej wiki. Dakujem.

node/6795811749 - what is for "completeness" when you actually create a partial and incomplete address (just city (and wrong) and street). There is an address right next to the shop at node/3113640578 .
node/4558411701 - is the fastfood open again, have you seen it? If so, why didn't you remove the disused:amenity=fast_food tag meaning it isn't working right now.
way/571432146 - Petrzalska plavaren is already mapped at way/306454482 so why are you duplicating all the tags to the building too? You can see there are now 2 "Petrzalska plavaren" with a swimmer icon rendered. Also, building=service is outright wrong (learn the proper values at building=*) and the syntax of opening_hours is wrong too (doesn't the so clever iD editor check it??).
node/4771549558 - false noexits again.
way/27445793 - why is access=yes needed here? Also incline=up is wrong, why did you need to change it?
way/859558580 - I'm not sure there are any steps here, but if they are, you did them wrongly, just overlaying the footway instead of replacing it.
way/859558581 - I don't think there is asphalt here, but I can check.

node/8002275047 - why the node?
way/380152148 - why did you remove the footway? Is it blocked now inside of Alfa restarant? last I was there it did exist.
node/2518390367 - addr:city=Petrzalka, how useful again.
way/407193783 - nonsense maxspeed=10 again?

node/3359046423 - address with only city and postcode? Very useful...
node/3359046422 - the added url https://www.drmax.sk/lekarne/od-kaufland-romanova-ulica-1-bratislava does not seem to show any pharmacy, it seems the right url is https://www.drmax.sk/lekarne/od-kaufland-jantarova-cesta-30-bratislava . And it shows that operator MEDICATE s.r.o. really operates that pharmacy. So why did you remove it? You haven't been to the place, were you?
node/2667528516 - this represents the back door to the apartment building, not to the restaurant, so all the tags you added (like access=customers) are wrong.
way/858405433 - wrongly placed, weird shaped, non-buildings and halfway unneeded (as there already was shelter=yes on the bus_stop).
way/379587817 - the roads on top of this tunnel have layer=1, so the tunnel at level=0 was OK, and it isn't really underground (it is weird construction), so adding layer=-1 was just some automatic fix again.

What? Maxspeed=10? Show me a photo of the traffic sign on all those parkings and
node/7998133102 - why is this node needed? The footway is still straight after introducing it.
way/857914917 - please do not introduce roads from outdated imagery that no longer exists.
node/7998133094 - why does the dirt path end on edge of the grass, and not connect to the footway?
node/7998133104 - what does this node add?
And you really do not need to add oneway=no to every road, only to those that could be dubious (someone could ask if they aren't oneway actually).

Examples what is wrong here:
node/1954645882 - the road isn't really noexit here, pedestrians can go to the adjacent footway, just pass a kerb (curb), but nobody bothered to draw the 1-meter long highway=footway from the parking aisle to the footway. So adding all those noexit=yes tags (and only randomly to some aisles) is factually wrong. Some form of transport can continue. I know you get a warning there, but your solution was wrong for it.
node/8004094847 - invalid colour again.
way/858617615 - what? A bus platform in the middle of the street? You even knew the bus stop is at node/1450136167 (you touched it).
node/3257221360 - you do not need to put address on every shop if it is inside a building that already has an address.
You do not need to add drive-through=no to everything (even post_boxes), more uncommon and interesting would be when a facility is drive-through=yes.
way/601793530 - why layer=2? The bridge is layer=2, this building is below it. Actually I think 0 would be correct here and would solve all problems (your fix doesn't, now you have another footway with layer=1 in this building, which is actually above it in reality). So again you are just randomly trying to make iD happy, without being at the place.
way/430860854 - we do not use 'usage' tag on tram tracks in th whole city, so adding it tu this single segment is just bogus.
way/858617616 - again, needless, duplicating platform (at least on the sidewalk now).
node/5364647060 - direction unneded on a oneway road. But not really wrong, just needless and clutters the objects where there are too many needless and default tags.
node/1334878102 - why moving this node to make the buildings not rectangular?
way/118751385 - why removing this terrace? The surrounding buildings have it too.
way/186014335 - layer=-1? Is this way underground or what? As it is on top of the surrounding small buildings (the terrace), layer=1 could work.
node/5457830395 - why this footway need to be moved farther from the building? You can't see the footway on Bing (that you claim as source), not Mapillary (there are no images on Mapillary on this street so aren't you lying here a bit?) so how do you know where it has to be? Did you visit it? I don't know, but I see the footway on better imagery and have moved it back to where it was.

So as you can see, again a mostly pointless and even damaging changeset.
Only adding the 2 ticket vending machines and waste baskets seem useful.

Yes, breaking by type of changes would be good, but I suggest you do not make automated changes suggested by the iD editor, as its suggestions are often wrong.
Only change places you have visited or can see on imagery. Please do not use Bing, but "Ortofotomozaika SR" imagery. Or Maxar is currently a bit newer in Bratislava than Ortofotomozaika, but lower resolution.
Yes, you have quoted 10 sources (some questionable like openrailwaymap, which is created from OSM data so what information could it add?), but not that you visited the places. So next time also add source=survey when uploading the changeset, or even better or individual objects that you have seen (and can't be seen on imagery).

Some examples of the errors:
way/443260055 - what allows bicycles here? Why did you add bicycle=yes? Also, if it is layer=-1 (unneded, layer=0 was fine), then it must NOT have a common node node/8004062937 with the way that goes above it on the terrace.
way/443103825 - addr:city=Petrzalka? Really? So this will be single address in Bratislava having this in the city tag. We currenly use addr:city=Bratislava, even though maybe Bratislava-Petrzalka would be better.
node/3823629479 - adding just street name and no number to a closed shop? What is the use for such and incomplete address?
node/3823629475 - you changed opening hours starting at 9am, I have seen recently it is startin 8am as it was before. So why the change?
way/858611498 - why splitting this road from the other part in the school grounds, when you didn't put any differing tags there? Maybe the school segment is behind a fence and should have access=private, but you didn't add that.
way/127501262 - this way does not represent a bus stop so adding public_transport=platform and departures_board to it is wrong and actually duplicates the bus stop causing confusion to users.
node/8004062926 - colour=Yellow-Red ? Please use valid colors from colour=*.
way/680624605 - the way really does below the VUB building here so cutting it off and ending it at the building edge (as if there was an entrance) is completely wrong. You weren't there and just blindly fixed some incorrect suggestion from iD editor, causing the footway now be totally wrong. You can visualize your changes here: https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=92428014

V JOSM podkladova vrstva Maxar Standard Imagery .

Nie, nemal by sa od Malokrasnanskej odpajat skor, odpajanie od kolajnic je dobre. Mal by sa k Racianskej pripojit skor, hned po par metroch, len ako sa zatoci.

Neviem kde je byvala AB Kozmetika. Ale pozeram snimky Maxaru (asi 2019), kde obytne domy v areali Male Krasnany su kompletne hotove, tak prepokladam, ze to je spravny stav (krizovatka tam aj tak vyzera rovnako ako na Ortofotomozaike z 2018, ale inak ako na starsom Bingu). Viete potvrdit, ze na fotkach Maxaru je aktualny stav? Krizovatky pri zastavke elektriciek Male Krasnany a tiez krizovatka Malokrasnanskej a Racianskej.

Because line 5 goes to Komisarky (in Raca), where neither 4 nor 9 go to.
Yes, I removed the fixme now, but I only found it by accident doing something else. So next time if you just want to mention we should update some tram time you can put an OSM note on the position of the affected tram (or its new route), not touch an unrelated relation where nobody will find it.
We do track public transport changes in Bratislava and changes are regularly implemented in OSM the day they they happen in reality. You placed the fixmes on 20th of Oct, while the lines 4 and 9 only started operating on 26th Oct. So I do not see your motivation of "When I added the fixmes, the lines 4 and 9 were not yet mapped on the new route". If they had been mapped on 20th, it would be an error (or just a premature mapper :)). Yes, so all is OK now.

Aj ten, ma koncit blizsie ku krizovatke. Ked si to zvizualizujete cez https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=64355491 , tak tie povodne (cervene) cesty boli spravne, Vami vytvorene (zelene a zlte) su prilis daleko a niektore su zbytocne vytvorene paralelne cesty. Nejde len o tu jednu cestu ale cely komplex v krizovatke. Teraz tam uz nerobte, mam to rozrobene.