Zdravim, ake "streetlevel imagery" ste tu pouzili?

Hi. Thanks for the additions.
But please try to use established tags as described on osm.wiki .
E.g. the object at node/12826418893 is no park, nor a meadow, nor is it called "Beehive meadow" (especially in Slovakia, where local language is not English). So do not put random descriptions into the 'name' tag. Only use proper object names there. The contents of 'description' is fine.
What you wanted is landuse=apiary and man_made=beehive . Thanks.

Tiez ak to nie je prevadzka, kam ma chodit verejnost (ako na beznu policajnu stanicu (napr. obvodne oddelenie)), tak tam nepatri ani amenity=police.

Zdraivm, dakujem za doplnenie. Ale davajte pozor, divadlo nezabera celu budovu. A ked ste ho zaznacili ako bod node/11432439988 tak netreba divadlo duplikovat aj na budovu.

Ale kedze si tam znacenie potencialne odporuje, kludne to prerobte na opacnu stranu (pridajte to bicycle=yes), ale nechajte 'note'.

Not sure what this changeset is about, but relation's name was not in Ukrainian, so copying it to name:uk is nonsense.

Dlzku trasy (distance) treba zadavat v anglickom zapise cisel, s desatinnou bodkou, aby tomu aplikacie rozumeli.

Zdravim, a je to k niecomu dobre, ked po nich uz niet ani stopy?

Este aj na useku way/1066662808 je znacka "zosadni z bicykla".

Na Ortofoto nevidite dopravne znacky. Ano, cyklopruh (cyklopriechod) tam je, napriek tomu tam boli zvisle znacky, ktore ukoncili "cesticku pre cyklistov".

Can you prove that people have actively removed the border controls from OSM (in Schenger) and there is a global agreement on that? Just becouse the border controls are missing in OSM does not mean people have removed them. There is the possibility people have never put them into OSM within Schengen area because OSM is newer than Schengen area and people may have the same reason as you. But we have put some of those border controls in Slovakia and you are now removing them.

Even recently people are adding border control points and facilities like way/1002726506 . YOu can even see on geoimage.at imagery that the straight road is blocked by bollards so that all cars must pass along these buildings to be checked. Yes, the officers may pass some cars, but they check passports of some. I can confirm this happens regularly even recently.

Yes, some of the controls may be temporary but they may still happen. So having the information where it may happen is useful in OSM.
Yes police can stop you anywhere, but they cannot disinfect your HGV anywhere :) Also, there is a much lower probability of that than on the border.

Can you show Hungarian community is fine with the removals? Did they even notice it yet that you have removed the controls? You hide the removals under very vague changeset descriptions like "Schengeni kiigazítások" (e.g. changeset/161316247 ) .

So I suggest the barrier=border_control nodes stay in place but maybe you can find a tag that refines them to say not everyone is always stopped/checked but the possibility is there. People may want to plan their journey avoiding possible border controls and you deprive them of information where the controls may be.

To, ze tam nie je zakaz, neznamena, ze tam cyklisti mozu. Pokial viem musi byt explicitna znacka, ze tam cyklisti mozu (teda na chodnik). Inak tam nemozu ist ako bicykel. Teda mozu, ale ako chodci (rychlostou chodze). Cize aj ked tam bicycle=yes nie je, mozu tam ist, ale ako chodci.
Nedavame vsade bicycle=yes len preto ze by tam mozno cyklisti chceli ist, alebo ze je tam znacena cyklotrasa. Treba aj zohladnovat dopravne znacenie. Kde date bicycle=yes indikuje mi to, ze na danom useku mozu jazdit plnou rychlostou bicykla.

Aka je tam dnes dopravna znacka? Ja si to uz samozrejme nepamatam, ale ako vidite, dal som tam 'note' ze tam je nejaka znacka, co cyklocestu ukoncuje, a usek priechodu je explicitne znaceny ako 'nie cyklocesta'. Mne sa to teda javi v poriadku. Ale ak sa znacky zmenili, popiste mi co je tam teraz.

A inak je to bezna situacia, ze na priechode je cyklocesta (bicykel v modrom kruhu) ukoncena a za nim zase zacina. Takze podla mna na priechode nesmie cyklista jazdit plnou rychlostou a bud zosadne alebo ide rychlostou chodca.

To, ze cyklisti bezne jazdia rychlo aj po chodnikoch, kde to nemaju povolene, je druha vec.

Hi, you cannot put 'parking' tag on a highway directly. Use something from this wiki page: osm.wiki/Street_parking

Sorry, that is not true. The border controls exist and are happening right now. Austria does checks on "Berg" border control station. Hungary, Czech republic,Poland does checks of hgvs transporting animals, due to the current cow disease spreading.

Just because the border control police does not stop all cars, it does not mean they are not there. They may stop you any time so that information in OSM is useful.

You can see the same problem (removing barrier=border_control) is discussed in Czech OSM forum at https://openstreetmap.cz/talkcz/c4061#map=8/49.799/15.439&layers=d and they do not agree with it.

1) No a to sa mi prave nepaci, ze to len hromadne prenesiete na budovu bez kontroly (minimalne tych, kde je v OSM adresa ina a teda je indicia, ze to nie je v poriadku). Aj tak musite davat pozor na budovy kde je adries viac a tam davat na vchody alebo nechat body. Takze sa mi nezda, ze by ste mohli len tak oznacit polu mesta a dat "presunut adresy na budovy". Okrem toho aj v registri adries su body umiestnene zle (su na inych budovach, v poli, alebo vobec nie su na vchodoch ako by mali byt). Takze nejake hromadne prenasanie na budovy neprichadza do uvahy. Treba prechadzat kazdu adresu ci aspon trochu dava zmysel tam kde je. Ak to nechcete robit tak neviem. Ale je potom velmi tazke hladat chyby dodatocne (vacsinou som ich nasiel len nahodou), omnoho jednoduchsie je to robit pri importe.

2) Takze preto, ze 161 nie je v registri adries, tak to vymazeme? Cize za ziadnych okolnosti nesmieme mat v OSM adries viac ako je v registri? Mat aj nejake, co v nom chybaju? To sa mi teda nepaci. Aj tak mame adries viac, lebo davame aj supisne cisla podla katastra na vselijake garaze a pod, a tie nie vzdy register ma. Cislo 3390 nechcem na 3 budovach, ale aspon na jednej. Zostalo na niektorej po Vasom odstraneni toho bodu?

3) To sa mi nepaci ako dovod.

4) Co tam este chcete robit? Budem mat dost roboty upratat tuto sadu zmien a este chcete robit dalsie?

5) Ano toto nie je Vasa chyba, proste ste si to nemuseli vsimnut. Opravim to.

0) No a to je podla mna chybny predpoklad, ze adresy co nie su v registri neexistuju. Existuju, napr. tie supisne cisla z katastra. Pri niektorych budovach mozno nie je problem, ze o nich zahranne zlozky nevedia. A mesto o nich vie, ma ich v katastri.

Chapem, ze je to sposob minimalizacie rozdielov oproti registru adries (co aj ja chcem), ale ak adresa existuje, dokedy budeme cakat nez si ju register adries prida? Kolko rokov? A dovtedy nemozme mat v OSM lepsie data?

Daju sa stiahnut vsetky chybajuce adresy, tak neviem ci ma zmysel zadavat este datum od. Ale ak vidite prinos tak kludne. Len to musi fungovat nejako automaticky (ze "kedy boli adresy do OSM pridane naposledy"), kedze ich mozu pridavat rozni pouzivatelia.

Ak by bol zoznam adries, ktore su zrejme chybne a neexportovali by sa stale znovu, bolo by treba vymysliet aj proces, ze keby sa nahodou v registri adries niektora z tychto adries zmenila (cokolvek), tak by sa to malo niekde zviditelnit, alebo napr. automaticky odstranit z toho zoznamu, nech sa adresa znovu prehodnoti.

vegan is not vegetarian...

Ano, ale iba s povolenim (bicykle volno), nie bicykel v modrom kruhu.

Rozumiem. Aj ked uvedenie "neexistujucej" adresy moze byt uzitocna vec a my proti tomu bojovat nemusime.

Na druhej strane to bude rozdiel (ak to v OSM nebudeme mat) oproti registru adries a pri aktualizaciach a doplneniach chybajucich adries to vzdy niekto znovu naimportuje do OSM (ak to odflakne a neskontroluje), alebo minimalne si bude musiet na tym lamat hlavu a vzdy to vymazat. Chcem dosiahnut co najmenej rozdielov oproti registru adries, aby sa aktualizacie mohli lahko vykonavat a nemuseli sa vzdy znovu a znovu analyzovat tie iste chyby a rozdiely.

Bolo by cestou mat nejaku "ciernu listinu" identifikatorov, ktore su v registri zrejme vadne a tie by ste vo Vasej aplikacii ignorovali/skryvali/neexportovali? V kazdej obci je takychto adries aj 10. Ja by som bol ochotny tych 10 niekam zapisat do zoznamu. Ale mam na starosti malo obci, tak neviem ako by na tom boli ostatni co robia adresy. Samozrejme zaslat ich obci na opravu je spravnou cestou, ale omnoho pracnejsou a mnohe obce to aj tak ignoruju.

Hi, part of the mural at node/6290752485 still exists.