No, a white solid line is no barrier, see the Lanes wiki page.

GPS is not precise enough to distinguish in which lane you are currently driving (especially at 130kph) so if it guesses wrong, navigation will recalculate the route in the middle of the junction an may give you wrong and dangerous instructions (like continue to the next junction even if you were previously supposed to exit at this one).

I don't see the problem at the 1st exit in Osmand you posted links to. Osmand does exit at the right point. It also has all the information in OSM to tell you to keep in the rightmost lane (using 'change' and 'turn' tags).
You even forgot to update the change:lanes tags so the information in OSM is now wrong and confusing to routers.
And even if you are driving at osm.org/?mlat=48.588421&mlon=18.898501#map=18/48.588421/18.898499, it is still possible in reality to change vehicle to the rightmost lane to take the exit. But you have forbidden this in OSM.

So no, the junction is not more correct this way, you have introduced errors and wrong information.

Please revert this all, and do not make such changes to roads in OSM, it goes against what the model is according to wiki (and this what routers would expect).

Zdravim, myslim, ze tu jedlo nevyrabaju (takze nie product=food), ale predavaju zariadenia pre gastro. Pozriem na to.

Hi, what is the point of these changes?
There is a single road with 3 lanes, without a physical separation or barrier. It should not be mapped as 2 OSM ways. See osm.wiki/Lanes#Motorway_with_lanes_and_destinations

Thanks, but there are some problems with these changes:
1. Do not move buildings according to Ortofoto images, when they are done according to a more precise source (kapor2 or ZBGIS, Slovak cadastre map). Your changes to buildings like way/61399303 at Zahradnicka have damaged correct buildings to incorrect positions.

2. You cannot have 2 level building like way/61399303 and inside it a 7 level building like way/1318227763 . This is incorrect 3D mapping and should be done differently (7 level 'building' outline and then inside the 2- and 7-level parts), see osm.wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings .

3. address like node/12200316201 is incomplete. You could have added a 'fixme' tag so that others notice and finish it.

4. You should not have deleted node/6502562114 but just change its tags to the new shop in its place, not create a new node node/12200314988 . History of shops at the same place is useful for other mappers.

5. Agains, building length of way/78068912 was correct according to cadastre map and imagery. You did not need to change it.

6. For removed buildings, we tend to change their tag from building=* to removed:building=*, not remove them completely from OSM. They may still be visible on older imagery and mappers may be confused. See osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix .

Hi, thanks for updating the railway tracks. However the movement of junction points at Kazanska/Dvojkrizna streets (e.g. node/25504814 and node/18003675 are all wrong. The ways representing roads can be split into 2 separate ways when there is already a physical barrier between them, or it is not physically possible to change from one lane (road) to another. If there is just a white solid line, they should not be separated. See osm.wiki/Lanes#Motorway_with_lanes_and_destinations . You should just have added ''change" tags, without touching the geometry.

Hi, thanks for updating the trolley wires in Bratislava.
However, you have done some mistakes here.

If there is already the tag trolley_wire=yes on both-ways road, adding trolley_wire:backward=yes or :forward does not add anything, as both ways are already tagged. On some roads you ment the wires are only in one direction, in that case you should have removed the bidirectional trolley_wire=yes tag after adding :backward or :forward variant.

Why is there no trolley wire at way/203390144 ? How would the trolleybus reverse to the next stop (on the opposite side of the road) ? The trolley wire exists there.

Naozaj je node/12925910365/ vnutri budovy? Podla fotiek na stranke Packety nie je. Preco to teda davate takto nepresne?

To iste, nezmyselny vymaz existujuceho bodu a vytvorenie noveho so stratou dobrych udajov.

Preco ste vymazali existujuci bod a nahradili novym, pricom ste stratili dobre udaje a pridali vase sporne? Takto sa to nerobi.

Dobry den. Naozaj je aj na Slovensku operatorom Zasilkovna? Podla webstranky je to "Packeta Slovakia s.r.o."

Aky je zdroj tychto udajov? Co je to "POI Imported", odkial ma udaje a aku licenciu?

Naozaj ma zmysel znacka postal_code ked tam nedorucuje Slovenska posta?

Super, dakujem.

Zdravim, podla coho je way/897470220 vojenskym uzemim? Je to tam nejako vyznacene?

Ak planujete mapovat viac a nieco by ste nevedeli, tak pozrite tu wiki (editor iD casto zavadza s navrhmi znaciek), alebo mi napiste, pripadne slovenske OSM forum je na https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk . Napriklad to miesto s ulmi v lese som Vam opravil.

Veru, Google sa nesmie. Moze sa fotky Mapillary.com a samozrejme vlastne, ale to spada pod source=survey.
Ak mate moznost byt pri zavorach a vidite aka je tam presne dopravna znacka zakazujuca vjazd vozidiel tak to je dobre pridat do OSM. Ak tam znacka nie je ziadna, tak asi len pre vozidla vlastnika ci s povolenim (vehicle=private). Chodci casto prejst mozu, ak tam nie je vyslovne zakaz vstupu aj pre chodcov, ci tabula "sukromny pozemok".

Zda sa mi, ze 1 a 2 su rovnake linky. Ale chapem, co myslite. Len ma to strasne nebavi sekat priechody este na take male kusky :)

Aha, dakujem.

Ano, to verim, zial konkretne iD editor, ktory pouzivate, casto zavadza a jeho nahrady nie su vhodne. Treba ich pouzit len ak naozaj rozumiete co znamenaju.

Dakujem za upozornenie. V dnesnej dobe to tak aj robim, ale samozrejme mi moze nejaka cesta ujst.

Super, dakujem.

Zdravim, co prosim vyjadruje znacka narrow=2 ?