OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
114102210 almost 4 years ago

Zdravim, aky je problem s tymi dvojitymi ciarkami? Slovak Lines dopravca mal takto oznacene zastavky, cize to bolo spravne, nie preklep. Zda sa, ze ARRIVA to uz tak nema, ale to ako zdroj neuvadzate.

118666610 almost 4 years ago

Ma to byt highway=platform. A public_transport=platform tam nema byt, kedze je to uz na tych bodoch nastupist.

Ak to domaci volaju aj "kricek", dajme to do znacky loc_name.

116730351 almost 4 years ago

Of course, when there are 2 concurrent tagging proposals, none of them will say it is wrong. But as none of them is approved, there is no point in converting one to the other.

Yes, indoor mapping is problematic in OSM yet.

113916664 almost 4 years ago

Nie, ani pri stavbe elektricky sa tu nic nezmenilo, znacky zdielanej cyklocesty idu okolo kanala, nie cez most. Skuste prestat s tymi bludmi po Bratislave.

39091280 almost 4 years ago

Zdravim, ani dnes tam ziadnu kamennu predajnu nie je vidiet. Na vydajnu e-shopu uz dnes existuje navrhovana znacka shop=outpost .

To 'eshop' v nazve je podla mna tiez sporne, na ich stranke pouzivaju aj verziu s tymto slovom ale aj bez.

118666610 almost 4 years ago

Dakujem za fotky, no je to na nich este dost rozostavane, ale nejake chodniky, ci nastupiste sa tam uz crta. Cisla nastupist uz su zadane, na bodoch ako node/3901058028, pomocou znacky local_ref. Podla mna plocha way/187995249 nie je potrebna, a uz vobec nie so znackou public_transport=platform, lebo ta uz je na spominanych bodoch, ktore reprezentuju nastupistia.
Ak chcete, zmente cestu way/1041686946 na highway=platform a tym by to mohlo byt hotove. na tie body nastupist este popridavajte tactile_paving=yes (dlazba pre nevidiacich), kedze je vidiet na fotkach.

Tie linky autobusov som uz opravil.
Inak pozeram, ze ulica sa nazyva "kricok", ale zastavky "kricek". Prosim skontrolujte na mieste na tabuliach, ze je to naozaj tak.
Dakujem

119280108 almost 4 years ago

No validators should suggest any changes based on a wiki page of a tag that was never voted on/approved.

But I have changed it to indoor=yes, which is allowed on a way even based on that dubious wiki page.

116730351 almost 4 years ago

We don't use indoor=corridor in the city, it was probably just an experiment from me to add a more precise value instead of indoor=yes. I did not notice it should be an area, even though as I said, that unapproved wiki page has no saying in this matter. I will convert the ways to indoor=yes so that they do not attract any more invalid conversions. It seems map roulette only identifies possible problems, it did not suggest you to change it to highway=corridor. That sees to be your decision and that is what I dispute. Because that tag is even less popular than indoor.

116730351 almost 4 years ago

Yes, if indoor=corridor should be an area, and we do not have an arrea here, the correct fix would be to change it to indoor=yes, which can be on an unclosed way.

You can also notice whole 'indoor' key status is only 'de facto' and was never approved, it is just one possible way to map indoor corridors. As such, the iD editor and map roulette have no business proposing any changes to or from it as any such suggestion is invalid. Unvoted/unapproved tag wiki page cannot be decided if it is incorrect. It is just someones random opinion on a tag and how it should be used. There must not exist any automatic corrections or tasks (maproulette) based on this wiki page, especially suggesting conversions to even less popular tags (highway=corridor).

iD editor is known to make wrong suggestions and even damaging automatic corrections. Please don't ever use it for automated mass changes.

116730351 almost 4 years ago

The whole change is problematic. There is no reason for the ways to be areas. The highway=corridor is an unapproved tag, where as the indoor=corridor mapping is much more widespread (see indoor=*). So as such this changeset will be reverted and if you got such a task from maproulette it seems bogus as a whole and you should report it to the authors.

118666610 almost 4 years ago

Zdravim, trochu opatrnejsie prosim, zial na zastavkach Zeleny kricek aj Hospodarska cerp. st. ste poskodili relacie liniek MHD. Napr. vymaz bodu node/3901057995 bol zbytocny a narobil skody.

Tie plosne nastupistia ako way/1041686939 som teda nepochopil, pisete, ze je tam prestavba, mate nejake fotky, ze by sme to posudili?

114662097 almost 4 years ago

Better changset descriptions please: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

110469159 almost 4 years ago

Hi, why is the bus driving on the platform for passengers? It drives a service road so the previous state was correct and your change does not make sense.

Similarly road way/977910859 should not exist, it is not separated from the main road.

113276900 almost 4 years ago

You say it is confectionary shop but do not mark it as such.

113712227 almost 4 years ago

Hi, how are those pedestrians prohibited on those roads? Show me the traffic signs. Thanks
If there is no traffic sign, you cannot add foot=no. Use at most foot=use_sidepath.

117527837 almost 4 years ago

A na ceste way/46043105 ked zmenite hodnotu na "none" to neznamena, ze tam bezna doprava nemoze v tom pruhu ist. Iba, ze tam nie je ziadne znacenie na ceste. Pristup vozidiel sa znaci znackami vehicle:lanes a pod. No uvidite ked to urobim.

117527837 almost 4 years ago

Na ceste
way/193784218 tie znacky "turn:bus:lanes" chcu co povedat? Vsetka doprava moze aj rovno aj doprava, ale bus iba doprava? Zda sa mi, ze je to presne naopak, podla znacky na mieste. A podla tej znacky na tomto useku este ziadny bus pruh nie je. Aj znacka bus:lanes (uz pred Vami) tam nema byt, okrem toho jej hodnoty su tiez uplne zle (preco by bus zatacajuci dolava musel ist len v pravom pruhu?). No upracem to.

117538117 almost 4 years ago

node/9514915767 ked je tam zakazane prechadzat, ma byt len crossing=no, ostatne znacky su zbytocne (pozrite crossing=no). Prosim nevymyslajte si znacky ako illegal a unauthorized, kde to nie je potrebne.

117527837 almost 4 years ago

way/1032619190 zase maxspeed:advised (neznama znacka)? Dopravna znacka odporucanej rychlosti (biele cislo na modrej tabulke) sa znaci maxspeed:advisory. Ale taka tam asi nie je. Ak ste odvazny si odhadnut akou rychlostou sa tam asi da ist, tak na to je maxspeed:practical.

Nie som uplne nadseny z tej cesty way/1032619190, ale asi je to lepsie ako tahat dopravu dokola cez way/7598325 .

117525288 almost 4 years ago

Zdravim, ked teda menite nazvy ulic, pozor aj na aktualizaciu znaciek ako name:etymology:wikidata=Q267888 a wikidata=Q26258962, ktore sa stale odvolavaju na Trnavsku ulicu.

A aky je teda zdroj nazvov? Ziadny ste neuviedli.

A pozor na tie preklepy (Rozznavska).