Dakujem. Velmi sa tomu nevenujem, takze ja konzervativne pridavam do relacii len tie razcestniky/smerovniky, ktore danu trasu spominaju. Ci tam mozu byt aj ine, neviem, skuste sa teda opytat na fore, https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk . Sam ale neviem aky to ma prakticky vyznam ich mat v relacii, ked s navigovanim po trase nepomozu, kedze na nich sipka pre trasu nie je. Dakujem.

Zdravim, dakujem, pozriem na to. Kedze nemam velmi vedomost o nazvoch tychto ostrovov, zrejme som len technicky menil nieco a preto sa javim ako autor tejto zmeny, ale v skutocnosti som zrejme len prevzal co tam bolo. A ani nazov Vydricky ostrov tam v tej dobre nebol. A nazvy od Ivora Svihrana treba brat s rezervou :) Ako pozeram popridaval ich tam radsej duplictne. No idem na to, dakujem.

Zdravim, aky je oficialny zdroj tychto razcestnikov pre Svatojakubsku cestu? Pokial som dobre videl, tak node/5242616379 je cislo cyklosmerovnik a o Jakubskej ceste na nom ani zmienky (myslim, ze ona vo vseobecnosti nie je velmi znacena).

Hi, you can't add a non-existent tram route as a valid route=train relation. There must be some 'abandoned' tag in the relations so that data consumers can know to ignore it for current transportation. I will do it.

Hi, please always mention the source of your data. You only mention Bing aerial imagery, where you can't see the house name of "Dom u čierneho havrana". Also it is hard to find any trace of such a building name on the web. Thanks

Hi, please don't use 'end_date' tag for objects stat still exist, e.g. relation/7245595. The sign on the building does not mean it ceased to existin 1776. Thanks.

Zdravim, dost divna zmena, cafe Klarinet je tam dodnes, naopak ziadna stopa po nejakej restauracii Andaluzia...

Zdravim, nezobrazovanie niecoho v mape (ktorej?) nie je dovodom na zmenu dat, osm.wiki/Cs:Zna%C4%8Den%C3%AD_pro_vykreslov%C3%A1n%C3%AD .

Zdravim, tak neviem ktory editor (asi iD) Vam historic=memorial zobrazoval ako sochu, ale podla neho sa teda netreba riadit. Aspon to vysvetluje, preco ste potrebovali pomenit mnohe pamatniky po Bratislave na umelecke diela (v inych sadahc zmien). Kedze ste to dodnes nevratili naspat, budem to musiet urobit ja.

Hi, you say to convert to consulate=honorary_consul (correct), but actually do consulate=honorary_consulate (incorrect). Please pay attention to such typos and introducing unnecessary new values.

Thanks, but that does not solve my objections.

Why are you changing to a tag, that has no defined meaning? embassy=embassy, may be the most used that, but it has no description, which is even visible on the taginfo page. So if you don't know what it means, why are you changing objects towards it? I see the usage of the tag is so high, because it is often you converting embassies from the approved embassy=yes to the invalid embassy=embassy. I have checked multiple neighboring capital cities.

Also, a JOSM warning does not mean you can mass-convert deprecated tags, as the wiki points out. Objects tagged with the old and new schema that does not conflict are not a problem.

Hi, first, it's not good to do a wholesale replacement of the tags (see top of amenity=embassy) and second, why changing embassy=yes to embassy=embassy? That does not look like a valid value: embassy=* .

Zdravim, node/3073840517 zase zmena na kriz, aj ked tam ziadny nie je? Mate chybny zdroj (aj ked stale ziadny neuvadzate).

Zdravim, stanicu lanovky (aerialway=station) stacilo zaznacit raz, ked uz je na node/333619562, tak nemala byt aj na way/30270124 . Objekty sa nesmu takto duplikovat. A preco myslite, ze ma mat stanica lanovky este aj public_transport=station ? Kde ste to takto videli? Dakujem

Dakujem, dal som tam nazov aky je naozaj na tabuli na budove.

A aky je zdroj Vasho nazvu "Rímskokatolícky farský úrad". Taky na budove vobec nie je a Vy uvadzate len zdroj "Bing", odkial to samozrejme nemozete mat. Dufam, ze ste inde po Slovensku taketo zmeny neporobili.

Zdravim, nemuseli by ste menit office=religion na office=parish (office=parish), ktore nema ziadny opis a teda definiciu, cize ako viete ci sa tato konkretna budova ma tak oznacit. A na farsky urad sa javi byt office=religion spravna a popularnejsia znacka.

Hi, why are you doing this? Some roads like 'unclassified' are implicitly passable by bike, so no bicycle=yes is needed. On highway=path it may be needed. However, have you visited all the segments of the route to see whether they really are passable and allowed for bikes? There may be traffic signs disallowing bicycler and other vehicles. That is quite common in Slovakia. So unless you did that, never just put bicycle=yes to anything just because it is a member in cycle relation. Please undo all changesets similar to this one, unless you visited every segment of the route. Thanks.

Zdravim, prosim piste zmysluplne popisy sad zmien (pozrite osm.wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn), 'aa' je nezmysel. Okrem toho tiez uvadzajte zdroj Vasich zmien. Napr. tu neuvadzate ziadny (len Vas editor dolnil, ze ste pouzili snimky Bing) a pritom ste pridali napr. nazov kastiela, co na fotkach nemozete vidiet. Tiez pozor na preklepy, tu napr. Kaštiel bez ľ. A pre mapovanie na Slovensku namiesto Bingu pouzite letecke snimky Ortofotomozaika SR. Dakujem.

Mensie budovy sme identifikovali, ze obkresluju steny budovy bez previsu strechy. Ano niekedy v katastri nahlasia kolnicku a v skutocnosti je tam vila. Ale videl som rovnake pripady aj v Inspire. Mam dojem, ze ked budova v kapore sedi na Ortofoto, tak je presnejsia ako Inspire, ten ich ma dost nahrubo a naopak ma este vacsi obrys ako je strecha. Okrem toho som videl aj pripady kde v kapore boli 2 budovy, ale Inspire to spojil do jednej. To je problem, ked chceme dat na budovy supisne cisla. Preto sa snazim dost dodrziavat delenie podla kapora. Ale jasne, da sa kombinovat oba zdroje. Kolnicky v zahradke (ak vobec su na Ortofoto) mozu byt podla Inspire, len teda tam uz prinos je minimalny, kym nam zatial chybaju hlavne budovy (nestihame novej vystavbe).