aceman444's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 175090096 | 11 days ago | Sorry, I don't have local knowledge of this area, I just looked at the imagery. Please fix it from your sources. Thanks |
| 175218318 | 11 days ago | Super, to je pekne, ze sa tam da zadat aj datum jazdy.
|
| 146819598 | 11 days ago | Ano ten bod som opravil, dakujem za posun aj tej dalsej pripajajucej sa cesty. Cesty by sa mali spojit do jednej kde konci fyzicka zabrana a srafovanie. Plna ciara uz nie, tam staci jedna OSM cesta pre oba smery. |
| 175090096 | 12 days ago | Hi, there is parking tagged on way/115842928, why does it also need to be on the building covering it (with solar panels)? Is there another parking on top of the building? |
| 169416131 | 12 days ago | Cyklotrasa popri VUB nie je fyzicky oddelena od chodnika, je to podla dopravnej znacky chodnik pre pesich aj cyklistov len je segregovany (ciarou na ceste). takze staci znacka segregegated=yes a bicycle=designated a foot=designated na jednej OSM ceste. Ak sa jemne zmenil tvar krizovatky Dunajska/Mlynske Nivy a tie ostrovceky, tak to uvidime ked budu na leteckych snimkach. Dovtedy su to len odhady od oka a kozmeticke zmeny ;) Ak aj zostane povodny stav, ale aspon tam nebudu routovacie problemy, ktore ste sposobili. |
| 165399064 | 12 days ago | Ked si vsimnete v Bratislave to hromadne zmenil jediny autor a este sme nemali tu chut to po nom vratit naspat. Ale dostaneme sa k tomu, kedze adresy generujeme aj automaticky z registra adries (bez medzier).
|
| 135841656 | 12 days ago | The Hungarian name of maly Dunaj is already tagged on the whole river relation at relation/5535899 . No need to add it to parts of the river. |
| 168467799 | 12 days ago | Hi, how did youi find out the number of road 130? There is no Mapillary street level imagery along this road. So what imagery did you use? Also, the Slovak road database does not have a road 130, it is still marked as 1049. Also road 130 would be sencodary, not tertiary.
|
| 167960404 | 12 days ago | way/51874700 adding building=hotel only specifies how the building looks like, or how it is constructed. It does not say it is used as a hotel. For that you need tourism=hotel. You have totally destroyed the building of Tempo shop in Zlate klasy way/51874970 . The original building was correct. Do NOT use the Bing imagery, it is outdated and unclear. Use Ortofotomozaika SR and Slovak cadastre map. Then you would see the building was correct.
Also do not add fictional addr:* components (like addr:street on the Tempo shop) when the building does not have a streetnumber (only conscription number). We import addresses from official state register and follow its definitions of addresses for all buildings. The building way/51875156 can be seen on your Bing imagery, why did you remove it? I have fixed the problems (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=175690419 ), but pay more attention next time. Thank you for the other changes that look good. |
| 167960404 | 12 days ago | Hi, on swing gate node/12944830848 what do you mean with motor_vehicle=designated? It means that the object is especially designated for all motor_vehicles to use (so not a restriction, actually a recommendation to use). Is that what you really meant? Isn't the gate actually restricting motor vehicles to private access? |
| 149072932 | 12 days ago | 2)Ano, moze sa tadial snazit navigovat. Ale to moze aj cez parkovaciu ulicku, aj ked teda s mensou pravdepodobnostou. Ale zase si nemozeme vymyslat data, ktore niesu len kvoli navigacii. Riesenim je doplnit tam existujuce znacky Stop na oboch stranach cesty.
|
| 66372894 | 13 days ago | Zdravim, preco je bazen turistickou atrakciou? A hlavne ked je pristupny iba zakaznikom hotela? |
| 146819598 | 14 days ago | Zdravim, preco posun bodu node/205261324 o taky kus na vychod? Javi sa mi, ze sa cesty zbiehaju skor a povodna poloha bola lepsia. |
| 149072932 | 15 days ago | Zdravim, dakujem za doplnenie. Pozor ale na spravne znacenie.
Cesta way/331295702 cez pumpu nie je ziadna parkovacia ulicka, takze nie parking_aisle. Ma byt bez driveway=*. Na ceste way/473808211 je aka dopravna znacka, ktoru ste chceli vyjadrit pomocou access=permissive (cize pristup pre vsetkych kym si to vlastnik nerozmysli)? To by aj mohlo sediet, len neviem ci to ste naozaj mali na mysli. |
| 175218318 | 15 days ago | Dakujem, budeme to testovat.
|
| 165399064 | 16 days ago | Zdravim, adresa uz bola na hlavnej budove gymnazia. Netreba ju duplikovat aj na tu malu budovu. Ak by mala rovnake supisne cislo (co podla katastra nema), tak sa daju spojit do jednej budovy (s roznymi castami) a mozu mat jednu adresu, nie dve duplicitne (a nekompletne). A prosim nepridavajte do PSC medzery. |
| 175218318 | 16 days ago | A ktora navigacia tomu rozumie? Skusal som OsmAnd a ten asi ano, ale este aj nejaka ina?
Co keby sme podmienku otocili a dali tam access=no + access:conditional=yes @ (2025 Dec 22-2026 Dec 31) (ak to bude fungovat). Takto tam navigacie, ktore nerozumeju access:conditional nebudu routovat az kym to nezmenite na access=yes (fyzicky 22.12.) a nezaktualizuju si data. Tie co tomu rozumeju tam budu routovat od 22.12. tak ako ste chceli. |
| 175218318 | 17 days ago | Lebo na malom useku way/1448618975 je este zabudnute access=no.
|
| 171667541 | 18 days ago | Ano, je to smutne, ked su znacky len z jednej strany, tak ako to potom maju ludia chapat a dodrziavat. A ako zmapovat. Sice niektore vlastnosti vieme urobit aj smerove, ale je sporne, ci to tak je naozaj na ceste myslene. Ako ste to spravili bude zatial dobre. Na prvej fotke vidim, ze na Cilizskej konci zona 30, co nemame zakreslene, tak to by bolo velmi zasluzne preverit odkial pokial je. |
| 169604722 | 20 days ago | Zdravim, preco na zastavke D pisete, ze nema pristresok ani lavicku? V minulosti mala pristresok juzne od trafiky Tabak Press. Zmenilo sa tu nieco? |